Active Users:620 Time:06/06/2026 04:15:08 AM
Sure, I agree. Legolas Send a noteboard - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM

View original postIt's your mom.

Sure.
View original postI mean, you're right that to refer to a person as 'it' when 'he' or 'she' or singular 'they' would do is insulting, but not correct that it is always wrong to refer to an adult as 'it', even when the person's gender is not in question. Because 'he', 'she' or 'they' will not always do.

The first part being the important one here. There are grammatical constructions where you would use 'it' for any and all persons, yes. When I talk about referring to adults as 'it', I'm talking about choosing to do so in the large majority of cases where the grammar allows you to choose between 'he', 'she' and 'they'.
Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 930 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 613 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 659 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 601 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 614 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 400 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 618 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 553 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 602 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 617 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 635 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 589 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 758 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 618 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 611 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 621 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 638 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 602 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 600 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 590 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 595 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 286 Views

Reply to Message