Active Users:944 Time:03/02/2026 07:02:07 AM
Because it is just contempt Roland00 Send a noteboard - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM

View original post
Why the adult qualifier? Is the age of the individual a factor in whether one is "humanized" or not?

~Jeordam


Because it is just contempt, and contempt being expressed to another human being has so little benefits in human conversation.

Here, let the AEI president Arthur C. Brooks describe this point. (Well former president now for he retired this year in 2018 after a 10 year stint at running AEI, AEI is usually considered one of the two most important conservative think tanks in the US)

EKS, it starts with "Contempt conviction of the utter worthlessness of another human being"
Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 876 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 573 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 608 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 560 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 562 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 379 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 573 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 508 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 545 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 575 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 587 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 549 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 706 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 561 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 563 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 568 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 582 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 555 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 550 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 535 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 544 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 262 Views

Reply to Message