Active Users:710 Time:24/03/2026 07:31:28 AM
Sure, I agree. Legolas Send a noteboard - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM

View original postIt's your mom.

Sure.
View original postI mean, you're right that to refer to a person as 'it' when 'he' or 'she' or singular 'they' would do is insulting, but not correct that it is always wrong to refer to an adult as 'it', even when the person's gender is not in question. Because 'he', 'she' or 'they' will not always do.

The first part being the important one here. There are grammatical constructions where you would use 'it' for any and all persons, yes. When I talk about referring to adults as 'it', I'm talking about choosing to do so in the large majority of cases where the grammar allows you to choose between 'he', 'she' and 'they'.
Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 893 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 587 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 627 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 576 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 580 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 387 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 591 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 524 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 561 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 589 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 603 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 565 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 721 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 585 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 582 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 588 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 600 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 570 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 568 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 551 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 559 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 270 Views

Reply to Message