I'm anticipating a bit of a mess on first use of this, since its more complicated then Hypocopping and that was a mess the first couple times too, so a quick reminder before we move into reveal phase. That code you give, something between half a dozen and 30 characters long, needs to have a key of a credible and singular nature, and that code needs to have your role name, or a very unambiguous equivalent, in it. This is going to be a mass roleclaim, designed for effective simultaneous reveal, if you try to escape that by being vague or misleading, you'll probably be lynched. So, if your code breaks down to "Roled" or "Investigator" or "Cocktail" etc, I highly suggests you redo it before anyone reveals their role.
Code posted (Chronological)
Isaac - IPUFODTUDKQRWTRIONEFOR
Ranagrande - k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
Beetnemesis - WBRDCXRPOFTWCFCAHPYMINO
Yunalesca - YIMIFPOOFYMOSATFAJ
Kronin al'Sulc - LUGOVO?DS and CKAQONPIHOPX
Kylia Skydancer - VRIOFXMILMRZ
Fox and Ravens - 6C10565/6865846567747972
? - JHCKB95.D9F1H5 and A1MA1AAM-JHCKB95.D9F1H5
White Flame of Tar Valon - pM80tIJ1
Napoleon62 - Vanilla
.
.
.
Incidentally the last of the un-posted can go ahead and directly roleclaim, no code is needed and as this happens to be a list of our less frequent posters, I think I speak for everyone when saying we've no desire for further delay. Once the RCing begins, we're roughly proceeding backwards, but don't wait until its exactly your turn, or we'll get bogged down, don't try to be the last to reveal or delay, don't discuss other people's claims until you've decoded your own, frankly, try not to discuss them at all until everyone is done, we are waiting to reveal until everyone has their's in, even if that means a bit of delay.
Code Decryption -
Remember, your code must be decrypted, and please don't don't give a key or a hint and leave it at that from laziness or challenge. Don't just state your role either. The point of this exercise is to roleclaim so as to prove your roleclaim was made without prior knowledge of anyone else's. Sorry to keep banging the drum on this, but I want to avoid mistakes and I also want the noose firmly established and draped so no one can escape by claiming uncertainty, if you're not sure what we're doing, you need to say so before people start claiming. If you've made more than one code, you'll need to decrypt all of them, not just the most recent. And you need to step through your method, you can go forwards or backwards, whichever works for you, but you need to walk through it, and you should mention any hints or clues to the key you put in your message. This is unlikely to be a brief message, so to speed things up I strongly advise you prepare it in advance, I sent mine off as a NB to FT right after I encrypted it, so all I should need to do copy and paste, you probably should consider something similiar.
Claims and Decrypts
Napoleon62
Hasn't Decrypted Yet
Beetnemesis
Fox and Ravens
Isaac
Kronin al'Sulc
Kylia Skydancer
Ranagrande
White Flame of Tar Valon
Yunalesca
?
Code posted (Chronological)
Isaac - IPUFODTUDKQRWTRIONEFOR
Ranagrande - k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
Beetnemesis - WBRDCXRPOFTWCFCAHPYMINO
Yunalesca - YIMIFPOOFYMOSATFAJ
Kronin al'Sulc - LUGOVO?DS and CKAQONPIHOPX
Kylia Skydancer - VRIOFXMILMRZ
Fox and Ravens - 6C10565/6865846567747972
? - JHCKB95.D9F1H5 and A1MA1AAM-JHCKB95.D9F1H5
White Flame of Tar Valon - pM80tIJ1
Napoleon62 - Vanilla
.
.
.
Incidentally the last of the un-posted can go ahead and directly roleclaim, no code is needed and as this happens to be a list of our less frequent posters, I think I speak for everyone when saying we've no desire for further delay. Once the RCing begins, we're roughly proceeding backwards, but don't wait until its exactly your turn, or we'll get bogged down, don't try to be the last to reveal or delay, don't discuss other people's claims until you've decoded your own, frankly, try not to discuss them at all until everyone is done, we are waiting to reveal until everyone has their's in, even if that means a bit of delay.
Code Decryption -
Remember, your code must be decrypted, and please don't don't give a key or a hint and leave it at that from laziness or challenge. Don't just state your role either. The point of this exercise is to roleclaim so as to prove your roleclaim was made without prior knowledge of anyone else's. Sorry to keep banging the drum on this, but I want to avoid mistakes and I also want the noose firmly established and draped so no one can escape by claiming uncertainty, if you're not sure what we're doing, you need to say so before people start claiming. If you've made more than one code, you'll need to decrypt all of them, not just the most recent. And you need to step through your method, you can go forwards or backwards, whichever works for you, but you need to walk through it, and you should mention any hints or clues to the key you put in your message. This is unlikely to be a brief message, so to speed things up I strongly advise you prepare it in advance, I sent mine off as a NB to FT right after I encrypted it, so all I should need to do copy and paste, you probably should consider something similiar.
Claims and Decrypts
Napoleon62
Hasn't Decrypted Yet
Beetnemesis
Fox and Ravens
Isaac
Kronin al'Sulc
Kylia Skydancer
Ranagrande
White Flame of Tar Valon
Yunalesca
?
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
This message last edited by Isaac on 23/09/2010 at 09:02:22 PM
RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 05:39:03 AM
- 1786 Views
ARRRRRRR *NM*
15/09/2010 06:44:52 AM
- 580 Views
Omg. This reply cracked me up so bad.
15/09/2010 12:34:38 PM
- 955 Views
Arrrgggh
15/09/2010 12:50:18 PM
- 920 Views

Re: Arrrgggh
15/09/2010 01:29:15 PM
- 997 Views

plus...
15/09/2010 01:50:44 PM
- 888 Views
Voting Record
18/09/2010 05:41:39 AM
- 895 Views
Moving along
15/09/2010 02:47:27 PM
- 1142 Views
knife hand? *confused* *NM*
15/09/2010 10:25:01 PM
- 508 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 04:06:10 PM
- 941 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
15/09/2010 06:23:19 PM
- 1035 Views
my current suspects
15/09/2010 09:52:52 PM
- 1043 Views
How is that a tactic? *NM*
15/09/2010 10:21:04 PM
- 529 Views
Day 2 EVENT: In High Spirits
18/09/2010 04:53:47 AM
- 986 Views
I think 'Aye' is probably the best choice, Vote: Aye
18/09/2010 05:24:24 AM
- 809 Views
I can
18/09/2010 05:35:29 AM
- 908 Views
Nay
18/09/2010 05:25:57 AM
- 950 Views
Any debate? Anyone in favor of Nay?
18/09/2010 07:53:56 AM
- 951 Views
We need to come up with a plan
19/09/2010 05:59:26 AM
- 930 Views
Well, here's who voted for BA:
19/09/2010 08:04:26 AM
- 906 Views
? is the logical target
19/09/2010 08:56:53 AM
- 898 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
20/09/2010 02:10:49 AM
- 928 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
20/09/2010 03:14:22 AM
- 881 Views
Who are your candidates for lynch?
20/09/2010 03:58:04 AM
- 915 Views
I don't have any. Especially after my fail of a push for BA
20/09/2010 04:35:23 AM
- 865 Views
I think I have a plan
20/09/2010 06:33:29 AM
- 1046 Views
...erm...
20/09/2010 07:37:16 AM
- 1019 Views
Crypto tricks
20/09/2010 10:13:23 AM
- 958 Views
Some thoughts...
19/09/2010 01:21:56 PM
- 829 Views
this is the first time its happened while i've been playing atleast
19/09/2010 04:52:13 PM
- 858 Views
It looks like we're proceeding with the plan so a few reminders
20/09/2010 06:35:21 PM
- 989 Views
Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
20/09/2010 06:41:22 PM
- 925 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
20/09/2010 07:13:22 PM
- 898 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
21/09/2010 12:04:49 AM
- 869 Views
So if I'm understanding this properly...
21/09/2010 01:38:34 AM
- 875 Views
That is correct. *NM*
21/09/2010 01:44:37 AM
- 533 Views
im still not clear on the key thing.
21/09/2010 04:38:53 PM
- 891 Views
Okay
21/09/2010 05:28:23 PM
- 914 Views
Re: Okay
21/09/2010 07:43:39 PM
- 864 Views
You wanted to hint at it, not say it..... *NM*
21/09/2010 07:46:10 PM
- 538 Views
horsefeathers
21/09/2010 07:55:44 PM
- 847 Views

It's alright. So long as no one actually tries to decode it. :/ *NM*
21/09/2010 08:00:17 PM
- 546 Views
I'm glad I'm dead so I don't have to bother with this.
*NM*
21/09/2010 11:28:46 PM
- 494 Views

List of Codes and Roleclaims (Table)
21/09/2010 11:25:37 AM
- 1032 Views
So I shouldn't code my Role now? *NM*
21/09/2010 01:45:10 PM
- 485 Views
A couple Questions
21/09/2010 08:53:29 PM
- 887 Views
On this whole decryption thing though...
21/09/2010 10:28:57 PM
- 965 Views
Any idea when we are gonna start decrypting?
22/09/2010 01:44:39 AM
- 868 Views
Wait why does it say and between my codes?
22/09/2010 11:00:51 PM
- 881 Views
what now?
22/09/2010 09:27:09 PM
- 817 Views
Napoleon needs to roleclaim now
22/09/2010 09:51:56 PM
- 945 Views
Arg... REALLY sorry people.
23/09/2010 08:16:00 PM
- 913 Views
You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
23/09/2010 09:14:46 PM
- 953 Views
Why is that so suspicious?
23/09/2010 10:02:23 PM
- 895 Views
It's suspicious because it's not true
23/09/2010 10:17:43 PM
- 958 Views
Cause people tend to accentuate the negative, they seek to form patterns, and they like exaggerating *NM*
24/09/2010 05:07:13 AM
- 603 Views
Re: You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
23/09/2010 10:27:31 PM
- 958 Views
Everyone can start decrypting now
23/09/2010 09:01:24 PM
- 915 Views
Ok, I'll go ahead and do mine too
23/09/2010 11:16:29 PM
- 954 Views
I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
24/09/2010 12:45:09 AM
- 963 Views
Re: I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
24/09/2010 02:44:11 AM
- 900 Views
eh, what the heck
24/09/2010 03:04:29 AM
- 796 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
24/09/2010 05:13:50 AM
- 545 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
24/09/2010 05:13:51 AM
- 415 Views
other factors make me think otherwise
24/09/2010 06:07:31 AM
- 789 Views
right, mine
24/09/2010 10:37:45 AM
- 951 Views
Re: right, mine
24/09/2010 10:43:26 AM
- 897 Views
EPWOP
24/09/2010 10:55:42 AM
- 909 Views
Re: EPWOP
24/09/2010 12:47:47 PM
- 942 Views
Okay, that squares
24/09/2010 01:14:31 PM
- 872 Views
Re: Okay, that squares
24/09/2010 01:22:42 PM
- 956 Views
I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
24/09/2010 06:04:26 AM
- 790 Views
Re: I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
24/09/2010 02:29:29 PM
- 868 Views
While we're waiting on White Flame
25/09/2010 08:59:09 PM
- 1008 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
25/09/2010 10:47:47 PM
- 861 Views
EBWOP
25/09/2010 10:48:31 PM
- 858 Views
It's probably also worth noting
25/09/2010 11:17:19 PM
- 904 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
26/09/2010 02:47:14 AM
- 931 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens
26/09/2010 03:15:38 AM
- 971 Views
Eh. The RC's always mess me up
26/09/2010 03:43:54 AM
- 833 Views
Yes, they can be tricky
26/09/2010 04:00:52 AM
- 860 Views
Re: Yes, they can be tricky
26/09/2010 04:33:40 AM
- 921 Views
not to mention...
26/09/2010 04:55:30 AM
- 895 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
26/09/2010 02:31:43 PM
- 561 Views
I mean can we just lynch him without going through the procedure if he'll just give up?
26/09/2010 07:33:38 PM
- 1036 Views

Somebody want to hammer?
26/09/2010 09:02:17 PM
- 922 Views