Welcome to today's science lesson!
I chose to base my code on the Periodic Table of the Elements. When Isaac posted his example in his "Crypto tricks" post and used "Helium" as his key, it was such a marvelous coincidence that I couldn't resist adding in "a key such as Isaac referred to in his last post." The key that I posted in that followup post was also Helium.
"#" = "Helium"
If you look at a table of ASCII codes, # is number 35. 33 is the first number on the aforementioned table of ASCII codes that gives a non-blank character. So, let us subtract 33 from 35. That leaves 2, and 2 is the Atomic Number of Helium. And that is also a marvelous coincidence, because that is not what my code is based on. The Atomic Weight of Helium is approximately 4.0026. Let us round that to the nearest integer, and subtract the number of protons in a Helium atom which is equal to the Atomic Number, in this case 2. That gives the number of neutrons in the most common isotope of Helium, which is also 2. Now replace the "#" with the symbol for Helium, "He", and that is the basis of my code.
I used the words "positive" and "neutral" in that second post to refer to the sub-atomic particles used arrive at the correct numbers.
Now, looking at my actual code: k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
"k" is 107 on the ASCII table. Subtract 33 and you get 74. I had anticipated an extra layer of protection here, in that even if people knew what the method was, they would be unfamiliar enough with the elements that this would be a lengthy process of trial and error as they added various Atomic Numbers until they arrived at a suitable Atomic Weight. This particular aspect of my plan was foiled by Google, who will be happy to tell you all about Iodine if you enter a search for "74 neutrons." The Atomic Number for Iodine is 53. 53 + 74 = 127 which is the Atomic Weight of that element's most common isotope. The symbol of Iodine is "I" so "k" = "I".
Moving on, "?" is 181 on the ASCII table. Subtracting 33 will give 148. If someone was still under the mistaken impression that we were dealing with Atomic Numbers at this point, this would convince them otherwise, as the Periodic Table currently only goes up to 118. Solving for neutrons, we can find that we are looking at good old Americium, symbol "Am".
Continue this for each character in the code and
k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
becomes
I Am Am O Dy F I Dy Ac Ti O N Co P
Clean up a little spacing
I Am A mODyFIDy AcTiON CoP
and you have my role claim. I know, "modified" is incorrectly spelled as "mODyFIDy" but that was unavoidable given the limitations of the character set I was working with. I trust that it is still recognizable.
I chose to base my code on the Periodic Table of the Elements. When Isaac posted his example in his "Crypto tricks" post and used "Helium" as his key, it was such a marvelous coincidence that I couldn't resist adding in "a key such as Isaac referred to in his last post." The key that I posted in that followup post was also Helium.
"#" = "Helium"
If you look at a table of ASCII codes, # is number 35. 33 is the first number on the aforementioned table of ASCII codes that gives a non-blank character. So, let us subtract 33 from 35. That leaves 2, and 2 is the Atomic Number of Helium. And that is also a marvelous coincidence, because that is not what my code is based on. The Atomic Weight of Helium is approximately 4.0026. Let us round that to the nearest integer, and subtract the number of protons in a Helium atom which is equal to the Atomic Number, in this case 2. That gives the number of neutrons in the most common isotope of Helium, which is also 2. Now replace the "#" with the symbol for Helium, "He", and that is the basis of my code.
I used the words "positive" and "neutral" in that second post to refer to the sub-atomic particles used arrive at the correct numbers.
Now, looking at my actual code: k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
"k" is 107 on the ASCII table. Subtract 33 and you get 74. I had anticipated an extra layer of protection here, in that even if people knew what the method was, they would be unfamiliar enough with the elements that this would be a lengthy process of trial and error as they added various Atomic Numbers until they arrived at a suitable Atomic Weight. This particular aspect of my plan was foiled by Google, who will be happy to tell you all about Iodine if you enter a search for "74 neutrons." The Atomic Number for Iodine is 53. 53 + 74 = 127 which is the Atomic Weight of that element's most common isotope. The symbol of Iodine is "I" so "k" = "I".
Moving on, "?" is 181 on the ASCII table. Subtracting 33 will give 148. If someone was still under the mistaken impression that we were dealing with Atomic Numbers at this point, this would convince them otherwise, as the Periodic Table currently only goes up to 118. Solving for neutrons, we can find that we are looking at good old Americium, symbol "Am".
Continue this for each character in the code and
k ? ? ) é + k é ½ ; ) ( A 1
becomes
I Am Am O Dy F I Dy Ac Ti O N Co P
Clean up a little spacing
I Am A mODyFIDy AcTiON CoP
and you have my role claim. I know, "modified" is incorrectly spelled as "mODyFIDy" but that was unavoidable given the limitations of the character set I was working with. I trust that it is still recognizable.
RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
- 15/09/2010 05:39:03 AM
2101 Views
ARRRRRRR *NM*
- 15/09/2010 06:44:52 AM
767 Views
Omg. This reply cracked me up so bad.
- 15/09/2010 12:34:38 PM
1242 Views
Arrrgggh
- 15/09/2010 12:50:18 PM
1208 Views
- 15/09/2010 12:50:18 PM
1208 Views
Re: Arrrgggh
- 15/09/2010 01:29:15 PM
1279 Views
- 15/09/2010 01:29:15 PM
1279 Views
plus...
- 15/09/2010 01:50:44 PM
1200 Views
Voting Record
- 18/09/2010 05:41:39 AM
1168 Views
Moving along
- 15/09/2010 02:47:27 PM
1444 Views
knife hand? *confused* *NM*
- 15/09/2010 10:25:01 PM
665 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
- 15/09/2010 04:06:10 PM
1229 Views
Re: RAFO Mafia 18 - Day 2: Mystery on the High Seas
- 15/09/2010 06:23:19 PM
1359 Views
my current suspects
- 15/09/2010 09:52:52 PM
1403 Views
How is that a tactic? *NM*
- 15/09/2010 10:21:04 PM
697 Views
Expanding the list
- 16/09/2010 05:37:24 AM
1240 Views
Day 2 EVENT: In High Spirits
- 18/09/2010 04:53:47 AM
1309 Views
I think 'Aye' is probably the best choice, Vote: Aye
- 18/09/2010 05:24:24 AM
1076 Views
I can
- 18/09/2010 05:35:29 AM
1233 Views
Nay
- 18/09/2010 05:25:57 AM
1263 Views
Any debate? Anyone in favor of Nay?
- 18/09/2010 07:53:56 AM
1248 Views
We need to come up with a plan
- 19/09/2010 05:59:26 AM
1217 Views
Well, here's who voted for BA:
- 19/09/2010 08:04:26 AM
1186 Views
? is the logical target
- 19/09/2010 08:56:53 AM
1150 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
- 20/09/2010 02:10:49 AM
1218 Views
Re: ? is the logical target
- 20/09/2010 03:14:22 AM
1168 Views
Who are your candidates for lynch?
- 20/09/2010 03:58:04 AM
1192 Views
I don't have any. Especially after my fail of a push for BA
- 20/09/2010 04:35:23 AM
1167 Views
I think I have a plan
- 20/09/2010 06:33:29 AM
1334 Views
...erm...
- 20/09/2010 07:37:16 AM
1310 Views
Crypto tricks
- 20/09/2010 10:13:23 AM
1274 Views
Some thoughts...
- 19/09/2010 01:21:56 PM
1082 Views
this is the first time its happened while i've been playing atleast
- 19/09/2010 04:52:13 PM
1162 Views
It looks like we're proceeding with the plan so a few reminders
- 20/09/2010 06:35:21 PM
1297 Views
Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
- 20/09/2010 06:41:22 PM
1201 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
- 20/09/2010 07:13:22 PM
1227 Views
Re: Hmm. I don't think I did this exactly how you wanted, with the key and whatnot.
- 21/09/2010 12:04:49 AM
1131 Views
So if I'm understanding this properly...
- 21/09/2010 01:38:34 AM
1129 Views
That is correct. *NM*
- 21/09/2010 01:44:37 AM
706 Views
im still not clear on the key thing.
- 21/09/2010 04:38:53 PM
1179 Views
Okay
- 21/09/2010 05:28:23 PM
1201 Views
Re: Okay
- 21/09/2010 07:43:39 PM
1150 Views
You wanted to hint at it, not say it..... *NM*
- 21/09/2010 07:46:10 PM
675 Views
horsefeathers
- 21/09/2010 07:55:44 PM
1131 Views
- 21/09/2010 07:55:44 PM
1131 Views
It's alright. So long as no one actually tries to decode it. :/ *NM*
- 21/09/2010 08:00:17 PM
714 Views
I'm glad I'm dead so I don't have to bother with this.
*NM*
- 21/09/2010 11:28:46 PM
635 Views
*NM*
- 21/09/2010 11:28:46 PM
635 Views
List of Codes and Roleclaims (Table)
- 21/09/2010 11:25:37 AM
1349 Views
So I shouldn't code my Role now? *NM*
- 21/09/2010 01:45:10 PM
627 Views
A couple Questions
- 21/09/2010 08:53:29 PM
1138 Views
On this whole decryption thing though...
- 21/09/2010 10:28:57 PM
1276 Views
Any idea when we are gonna start decrypting?
- 22/09/2010 01:44:39 AM
1147 Views
Wait why does it say and between my codes?
- 22/09/2010 11:00:51 PM
1201 Views
what now?
- 22/09/2010 09:27:09 PM
1109 Views
Napoleon needs to roleclaim now
- 22/09/2010 09:51:56 PM
1235 Views
Arg... REALLY sorry people.
- 23/09/2010 08:16:00 PM
1205 Views
You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
- 23/09/2010 09:14:46 PM
1249 Views
Why is that so suspicious?
- 23/09/2010 10:02:23 PM
1195 Views
It's suspicious because it's not true
- 23/09/2010 10:17:43 PM
1252 Views
Cause people tend to accentuate the negative, they seek to form patterns, and they like exaggerating *NM*
- 24/09/2010 05:07:13 AM
739 Views
Re: You definitely do not get that in eveeeery game
- 23/09/2010 10:27:31 PM
1248 Views
Everyone can start decrypting now
- 23/09/2010 09:01:24 PM
1180 Views
Ok, I'll go ahead and do mine too
- 23/09/2010 11:16:29 PM
1303 Views
I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
- 24/09/2010 12:45:09 AM
1267 Views
Re: I was too lazy to verify beyond oxygen and flourine
- 24/09/2010 02:44:11 AM
1198 Views
eh, what the heck
- 24/09/2010 03:04:29 AM
1115 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
- 24/09/2010 05:13:50 AM
685 Views
Just out of curiosity, why do you say townie? RB could just as easily be scum, if not more so. *NM*
- 24/09/2010 05:13:51 AM
564 Views
other factors make me think otherwise
- 24/09/2010 06:07:31 AM
1068 Views
right, mine
- 24/09/2010 10:37:45 AM
1236 Views
Re: right, mine
- 24/09/2010 10:43:26 AM
1167 Views
EPWOP
- 24/09/2010 10:55:42 AM
1192 Views
Re: EPWOP
- 24/09/2010 12:47:47 PM
1218 Views
Okay, that squares
- 24/09/2010 01:14:31 PM
1204 Views
Re: Okay, that squares
- 24/09/2010 01:22:42 PM
1231 Views
I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
- 24/09/2010 06:04:26 AM
1076 Views
Re: I was lazy... I used the INTERNET
- 24/09/2010 02:29:29 PM
1136 Views
While we're waiting on White Flame
- 25/09/2010 08:59:09 PM
1279 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
- 25/09/2010 10:47:47 PM
1140 Views
EBWOP
- 25/09/2010 10:48:31 PM
1140 Views
It's probably also worth noting
- 25/09/2010 11:17:19 PM
1213 Views
Re: While we're waiting on White Flame
- 26/09/2010 02:47:14 AM
1222 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens
- 26/09/2010 03:15:38 AM
1254 Views
Eh. The RC's always mess me up
- 26/09/2010 03:43:54 AM
1092 Views
Yes, they can be tricky
- 26/09/2010 04:00:52 AM
1147 Views
Re: Yes, they can be tricky
- 26/09/2010 04:33:40 AM
1216 Views
not to mention...
- 26/09/2010 04:55:30 AM
1208 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
- 26/09/2010 02:31:43 PM
706 Views
I mean can we just lynch him without going through the procedure if he'll just give up?
- 26/09/2010 07:33:38 PM
1363 Views
- 26/09/2010 07:33:38 PM
1363 Views
Somebody want to hammer?
- 26/09/2010 09:02:17 PM
1204 Views

*NM*