Well say it already then.


Don't worry. I still suspect everyone to varying degrees. I am less suspicious of Kronin and F-T now than I am of most people, simply because Cop and Tracker are dangerous claims to make if untrue and no one has called them out on it.

I admit that the numbers are interesting, but I do see plenty of ways that it could have happened.


There's nothing weird about that at all. In fact, that's basically been my MO for lynching since the first game I played here. As I said the first time, I basically voted for you because your attempt to get a no-lynch struck me as being anti-town. If we have eleven players in the game, and exactly one of them is acting scummy, who does it make the most sense to lynch? I've voted off of far less before.

Also, you keep insisting that four investigative roles is too many and using that as proof that the SPLOG must be broken. In my game, the town had six investigators. Going back to your "proof" about the SPLOG though, why would you have any such information while your masons did not? Wouldn't the Thing be the least likely member of the Fantastic Four to know the details of Reed's experiments?


Why is it so clear that he can't be scum if has the SPLOG? What was there to prevent a Skrull from grabbing it instead of She-Hulk? If the Cop role were to be compromised, I think that would be the way to do it; it would be a nice comic bookish twist that would give near def-town status to a scummer. I don't really believe that at all, but it's a possibility.

I suspect it's all a moot point now anyway, because I'm convinced now that you are indeed scum.


Nice, an OMGUS vote. This, incidentally, is why I am now completely convinced of your guilt. Even discounting our differing opinions about no-lynches and the like, you are the one who came up positive and you are the one whose death will certify the sanity of our cop. My death would accomplish nothing.

And you're too good and too logical of a player not to realize that. I can understand the element of self-preservation and wanting to stay in the game, but if you were a townie you would have to at least recognize the value in lynching you today.


Evidence for lynches isn't about quality or quantity, it's about relativity. If I have slim evidence against you and no evidence against anyone else, you're most likely going to get my vote.

My vote took you to L-2, not L-1. Had I known ? was going to vote less than two minutes after me, I might have considered holding back. I did Unvote the next time I logged in, as per your request so you could offer your defense.


Right, so people without specific role-related information shouldn't be trying to catch scum?


Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if you and ? were Skrull together. You were each masons in different groups. He joined you in voting for a no-lynch. You might say you "pushed on him pretty hard" but your case was actually pretty weak and never could have gone anywhere. It easily could have been designed to create separation between the two of you.

Then there was his not-quite-vote... His post afterwards seemed to be one of indignation, but as you say, he never corrected it to make his vote count, although he could have easily done so. As ridiculous as it sounds, I could almost believe that you worked out the colon thing ahead of time.


I really don't think that will be an issue anyway.


Reading their posts, our investigators already know who they're targeting. There may very well be scum that voted for you even if you are Skrull, but there are probably more who didn't.