I'm suspicious because White Flame said he thought my claim was believable, but you aren't even though he hypocopped you innocent?
They're basically the same thing, as far as indicating innosence/guilt goes.
You are also overlooking that this is a sort of special circumstance, in addition to what Fox said, 4 of the 7 of the remaining players - not including me obviously - HC'd me, meaning I have a lot of data to push around, this is an advantage of HC-huddling. Nobody else got HC'd so much, so we can't say much.
Now on my table of elimination, where it as taken as a given we have a cop and I'm not it, and neither are you (backup killer or DF, no cop would fake claim of killer), Fox isn't (HC'ing same person twice), WF isn't (confirmed tank-f) you only get 4 people left.
Just reitierating -
Kronin if cop thinks me and DK are innocent
ranagrande if cop thinks I'm guilty and DK is innocent
fist if cop thinks DK and I are innocent
DK if cop has no cops on living players and would have to have a reason to have listed beet innocent and voted for him, which is possible if she was RB'd.
So again, There' no way you, WF, or Fox are cops, if I'm lying and cop I'm clean by definition, so it's either one of those 4 or no one at all. If it's Kronin or fist, I'm innocent, if it's rangrande I'm guilty or more likely he got blocked and made a non-ideal choice, possibly just doing it randomly, since it is absurd to think he would not have told other players if he found I was guilty, cops normally out themselves as soon as they find someone guilty. If it's DK, then she voted for beet while having investigated him innocent and knowing she was sane, or simply reported a false result.
Why is any of this confusing? I mean, obviously you are almost guaranteed to be tank-f, so under the circumstances you have good reason to make false comments on this, but the flavor of your comments implies you actually don't see this. Why would WF Hcing me innocent matter once he was ruled out as a cop, DF or not? Fist and Kronin also HC'd me innocent, ranagrande HC'd me guilty, it really doesn't matter what they did unless they're cops, the sheer number of HC's on me juat happened to let me show probtown. Now, I can only be a DF if one of four scenarios is true:
1) No cop
2) Ranagrande cop in spite of absurd silence and claiming otherwise
3) DK cop, and false reported
4) Someone else is cop and false reported.
Now notice that except for (2) none of those make me guilty, they just mean I'm as likely as anyone else, other than you and WF of course, so basically 2/6 of remaining players besides you two are tank-f and I'm as likely to be one as anyone else, 33%
I'm just kind of shocked that I am basically being hunted for claiming my full role. Had I just looked out for myself and sat on my comfy Mason ass instead of trying to help the town, I would be alright.I just really don't get how you guys all trust confirmed scum more than you do possibly very usefull mason/backup vigilante. It may be reflected on my posts.
Besides, I don't currently really trust you, even if everyone else does.
Tia mi aven Moridin isainde vadin
Lord Bergioyn of House Jaederan, Baron of Tridea, Pro Tempore Emeritus of the Landsraad, CHOAM Senior Director of Interplanetary Trade
6-7-0 + 1 + 2-0-0
Lord Bergioyn of House Jaederan, Baron of Tridea, Pro Tempore Emeritus of the Landsraad, CHOAM Senior Director of Interplanetary Trade
6-7-0 + 1 + 2-0-0
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 3 has ended
- 08/03/2010 06:20:26 PM
2013 Views
Okay, so it seems pretty clear that we have a third-party
- 08/03/2010 08:31:17 PM
756 Views
Man, I'm saddled with that job forever, aren't I?
- 08/03/2010 09:58:50 PM
721 Views
Whoops, kinda forgot Hobo died.
- 09/03/2010 01:22:27 AM
870 Views
- 09/03/2010 01:22:27 AM
870 Views
That's just bad manners, tsk tsk, you kill him, then you forget him, eh?
*NM*
- 09/03/2010 01:27:38 AM
429 Views
*NM*
- 09/03/2010 01:27:38 AM
429 Views
What's that now? Kronin killed Hobo?
- 09/03/2010 03:18:54 AM
712 Views
- 09/03/2010 03:18:54 AM
712 Views
Yes, I have incontrovertible proof that Kronin killed Hobo with a Candlestick in the Conservatory
- 09/03/2010 03:34:51 AM
742 Views
- 09/03/2010 03:34:51 AM
742 Views
Let's discuss our new info
- 09/03/2010 01:26:40 AM
811 Views
I don't really see how we're going to be able to come to a quick decision.
- 09/03/2010 06:19:11 AM
920 Views
Vote Record (Table)
- 09/03/2010 05:50:26 AM
879 Views
The Vote Record makes Fox seem very suspicious.
- 09/03/2010 12:20:23 PM
725 Views
I suppose so
- 09/03/2010 06:56:02 PM
770 Views
Good point.
- 09/03/2010 07:32:56 PM
838 Views
Re: Good point.
- 09/03/2010 08:15:32 PM
913 Views
Re: Hobo
- 12/03/2010 04:52:47 AM
845 Views
Pulling a Gher?
- 12/03/2010 05:20:27 AM
655 Views
There were like three times in a row that Gher tried to hammer
- 12/03/2010 01:27:31 PM
723 Views
I'm sorry. RBIRL
- 10/03/2010 07:57:15 AM
902 Views
*Taps on the glass*
- 11/03/2010 11:23:35 PM
874 Views
I'm thinking the same thing... *NM*
- 11/03/2010 11:36:39 PM
403 Views
Well, I was going to wait for our last Hypocop, but...
- 12/03/2010 01:24:32 AM
819 Views
Have I really?
- 12/03/2010 02:53:33 AM
761 Views
EBWOP
- 12/03/2010 02:55:16 AM
757 Views
Re: EBWOP
- 12/03/2010 03:47:04 AM
701 Views
Re: EBWOP
- 12/03/2010 04:04:40 AM
638 Views
Obvious how so? *NM*
- 12/03/2010 04:17:55 AM
498 Views
Well, something like what I did yesterday with the trap.
- 12/03/2010 04:30:47 AM
648 Views
A cop might do something like that.
- 12/03/2010 04:56:42 AM
825 Views
I'm just saying that I think anyone with a role or a bad guy would have been a little more...
- 12/03/2010 05:27:05 AM
703 Views
Re: I'm just saying that I think anyone with a role or a bad guy would have been a little more...
- 12/03/2010 01:23:29 PM
763 Views
Re: I'm just saying that I think anyone with a role or a bad guy would have been a little more...
- 12/03/2010 05:49:05 PM
812 Views
Hrm...
- 12/03/2010 08:05:29 PM
649 Views
Well, a DF working alone would just be a Serial Killer.
- 12/03/2010 08:19:02 PM
849 Views
well of course there are vanillas
- 13/03/2010 12:36:10 AM
720 Views
You all may have noticed...
- 14/03/2010 12:01:11 AM
737 Views
Re: You all may have noticed...
- 14/03/2010 01:49:24 AM
775 Views
On F-T....
- 14/03/2010 03:26:04 AM
661 Views
Re: On F-T....
- 14/03/2010 04:01:09 AM
817 Views
I'm just trying to point out any suspicions.
- 14/03/2010 04:07:09 AM
608 Views
Re: I'm just trying to point out any suspicions.
- 14/03/2010 04:27:54 AM
808 Views
Re: I'm just trying to point out any suspicions.
- 14/03/2010 01:32:16 PM
833 Views
Re: I'm just trying to point out any suspicions.
- 14/03/2010 02:24:03 PM
815 Views
Re: I'm just trying to point out any suspicions.
- 14/03/2010 02:25:20 PM
817 Views
I like Tank-f
- 15/03/2010 08:29:39 PM
634 Views
Eh, tank factions sounds better I think.
- 15/03/2010 08:33:38 PM
658 Views
Re: Eh, tank factions sounds better I think.
- 15/03/2010 08:35:42 PM
707 Views
Back
- 14/03/2010 12:07:58 PM
768 Views
On the subject of inactivity...
- 14/03/2010 01:31:40 PM
809 Views
I use my browser's 'Find' function
- 15/03/2010 03:54:48 PM
945 Views
The site's 'search' function is faster, but a bit limited
- 15/03/2010 05:43:11 PM
702 Views
Eh, for a quick look at how the Day's going, 'Find' works well.
- 15/03/2010 08:18:40 PM
964 Views
Re: Eh, for a quick look at how the Day's going, 'Find' works well.
- 15/03/2010 08:28:07 PM
927 Views
Are we sure we don't want a mass role-claim?
- 14/03/2010 11:55:02 PM
683 Views
Well, it's probably going to come to that before the end of the day
- 15/03/2010 12:29:59 AM
836 Views
So, are you saying I should RC next since fist already did? *NM*
- 15/03/2010 03:05:45 PM
356 Views
Personally I think he jumped the gun.
- 15/03/2010 03:11:35 PM
815 Views
He was a little quick on this one
- 15/03/2010 07:04:53 PM
681 Views
I kind of like this idea.
- 15/03/2010 08:28:05 PM
719 Views
Re: I kind of like this idea.
- 15/03/2010 08:36:09 PM
678 Views
I agree Ranagrande should claim next.
- 15/03/2010 08:45:14 PM
857 Views
Basically, he did jump the gun there but...
- 15/03/2010 05:44:56 PM
761 Views
Ok. I'm a Mason.
- 15/03/2010 07:44:45 PM
749 Views
Whoops! Wrong link!
- 15/03/2010 07:46:15 PM
639 Views
I completely believe you.
- 15/03/2010 08:08:04 PM
679 Views
Seems pretty trustworthy to me too.
- 15/03/2010 08:21:30 PM
657 Views
Re: Seems pretty trustworthy to me too.
- 15/03/2010 08:31:08 PM
844 Views
I'd have to agree
- 15/03/2010 08:43:26 PM
737 Views
Re: I'd have to agree
- 15/03/2010 09:21:42 PM
860 Views
Re: Ok. I'm a Mason.
- 15/03/2010 08:03:11 PM
669 Views
Re: Ok. I'm a Mason.
- 15/03/2010 09:27:21 PM
674 Views
Re: Ok. I'm a Mason.
- 15/03/2010 09:48:45 PM
692 Views
Re: Ok. I'm a Mason.
- 15/03/2010 09:58:37 PM
678 Views
We have a vigilante? God, he must suck.
- 15/03/2010 10:13:33 PM
606 Views
Re: We have a vigilante? God, he must suck.
- 15/03/2010 10:16:58 PM
662 Views
You know?
- 15/03/2010 10:20:10 PM
640 Views
Lol I saw the youtube address and thought you were trying to Rickroll us.
*NM*
- 15/03/2010 08:32:01 PM
385 Views
*NM*
- 15/03/2010 08:32:01 PM
385 Views
It's link to a video of finnish comedian, I linked it to my friend I was having chat with
- 15/03/2010 09:30:15 PM
631 Views
My role-claim, and a few other thoughts
- 15/03/2010 10:57:55 PM
815 Views
Re: My role-claim, and a few other thoughts
- 16/03/2010 01:53:01 AM
856 Views
LOL, lasty I checked Napoleon was our doc
- 16/03/2010 02:24:19 AM
650 Views
Re: LOL, lasty I checked Napoleon was our doc
- 16/03/2010 02:32:30 AM
748 Views
Re: LOL, lasty I checked Napoleon was our doc
- 16/03/2010 02:39:44 AM
639 Views
Re: LOL, lasty I checked Napoleon was our doc
- 16/03/2010 02:54:04 AM
840 Views
Let's NOT kill Bergioyn.
- 16/03/2010 02:59:17 AM
722 Views
Re: Let's NOT kill Bergioyn.
- 16/03/2010 03:08:10 AM
859 Views
I am not making an incorrect reference.
- 16/03/2010 03:12:02 AM
683 Views
Good
- 16/03/2010 03:20:23 AM
783 Views
EBWOP
- 16/03/2010 03:21:08 AM
654 Views
Another thing
- 16/03/2010 03:25:34 AM
841 Views
I'm not Arsonist, so there shouldn't be any neutralization message.
- 16/03/2010 07:01:10 AM
790 Views
Something is wrong here
- 16/03/2010 03:22:47 AM
783 Views
Oh, and Isaac
- 15/03/2010 08:38:08 PM
729 Views
Re: Oh, and Isaac
- 15/03/2010 11:22:21 PM
684 Views
LOL, there was like this massive bomb of posts and now... silence
- 16/03/2010 12:55:34 AM
816 Views
Well for starters I decided maybe I ought to work on my project that's due tomorrow.
- 16/03/2010 02:01:11 AM
802 Views
- 16/03/2010 02:01:11 AM
802 Views
Okay, here ya are
- 15/03/2010 11:58:14 PM
762 Views
Re: Okay, here ya are
- 16/03/2010 07:12:31 AM
703 Views
Re: Okay, here ya are
- 16/03/2010 08:01:24 AM
786 Views
Wait, what?
- 16/03/2010 08:11:54 AM
644 Views
Re: Wait, what?
- 16/03/2010 05:00:39 PM
749 Views
Re: Wait, what?
- 16/03/2010 07:46:43 PM
822 Views
Role Claims (Table)
- 15/03/2010 10:15:59 PM
849 Views
Re: Role Claims (Table) *NM*
- 15/03/2010 10:16:14 PM
384 Views
Whoops, replied instead of editing. *NM*
- 15/03/2010 10:16:29 PM
356 Views
You forgot mine. I calimed VT first, after all.
*NM*
- 15/03/2010 10:26:27 PM
415 Views
*NM*
- 15/03/2010 10:26:27 PM
415 Views
Okay, White Flame has claimed, and it seems decently legit.
- 16/03/2010 02:09:50 AM
829 Views
So many RC's, well mine...
- 16/03/2010 02:29:01 AM
848 Views
Now this is an interesting place we have reached, isn't it?
- 16/03/2010 03:25:19 AM
849 Views
Re: Now this is an interesting place we have reached, isn't it?
- 16/03/2010 03:31:27 AM
871 Views
Well, we should have a RoleBlocker too.
- 16/03/2010 03:40:33 AM
849 Views
Re: Well, we should have a RoleBlocker too.
- 16/03/2010 04:01:54 AM
687 Views
Vote Count
- 16/03/2010 03:46:08 AM
688 Views
Re: Vote Count
- 16/03/2010 03:51:48 AM
647 Views
Ahh, that's right.
- 16/03/2010 03:54:56 AM
795 Views
Isaac had voted too, but he unvoted since then. *NM*
- 16/03/2010 04:01:47 AM
380 Views
HOLY CRAP!
- 16/03/2010 05:39:37 AM
856 Views
Re: HOLY CRAP!
- 16/03/2010 01:19:02 PM
632 Views
Re: HOLY CRAP!
- 16/03/2010 04:13:50 PM
796 Views
I must concur
- 16/03/2010 05:24:17 PM
670 Views
Vote: White Flame of Tar Valon
- 16/03/2010 11:03:30 PM
777 Views
Vote: White Flame of Tar Valon
- 16/03/2010 11:05:48 PM
638 Views
Vote: White Flame of Tar Valon
- 17/03/2010 12:32:40 AM
716 Views
Vote: White Flame of Tar Valon
- 17/03/2010 12:38:28 AM
644 Views


*NM*