It is a narrative ploy. If they were easy to defeat, then there would not be suspense.
I always took Yoda's "no, not stronger" to mean that it might appear stronger, that it would be stronger on a direct assault, but that jedies given time are more powerful. So that it evens out. Like a sprinter and a marathon runner.
I always took Yoda's "no, not stronger" to mean that it might appear stronger, that it would be stronger on a direct assault, but that jedies given time are more powerful. So that it evens out. Like a sprinter and a marathon runner.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
- 11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
1655 Views
To make them a scary menace
- 11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
1208 Views
. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
715 Views
Precisely.
- 12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
1204 Views
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
- 12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
1555 Views
- 12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
1555 Views
Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
- 11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
1457 Views
- 12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
1163 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
- 11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
1279 Views
Mno
- 11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
1247 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
- 11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
1216 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
- 11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
699 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
- 16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
827 Views
- 12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
1163 Views
It makes sense
- 12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
1245 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
- 12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
1031 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
- 13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
1225 Views
Not they don't Edited
- 11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
1170 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
741 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
540 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
- 11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
675 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
- 11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
1129 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying.
- 11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
1142 Views
- 11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
1142 Views
Nonsense
- 11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
1200 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
645 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
- 11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
730 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
- 12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
1167 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
- 12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
1041 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
- 12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
1086 Views
It doesn't matter.
- 12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
1066 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
- 13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
1131 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
- 13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
1225 Views
- 13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
1225 Views
Because they're more powerful
- 12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
1354 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
- 12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
1135 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
- 12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
1134 Views

*NM*