to discover every useable bit knowledge of force whereas the jedi do not
Their adversarial development style means that as individuals, they are more combat oriented. Also, they are the underground types striking out at the establishment. Presumably they pick fights they think they can win.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
- 11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
1655 Views
To make them a scary menace
- 11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
1207 Views
. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
715 Views
Precisely.
- 12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
1204 Views
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
- 12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
1555 Views
- 12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
1555 Views
Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
- 11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
1456 Views
- 12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
1163 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
- 11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
1279 Views
Mno
- 11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
1246 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
- 11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
1216 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
- 11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
699 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
- 16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
827 Views
- 12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
1163 Views
It makes sense
- 12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
1245 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
- 12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
1031 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
- 13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
1225 Views
Not they don't Edited
- 11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
1170 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
741 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
540 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
- 11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
675 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
- 11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
1129 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying.
- 11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
1141 Views
- 11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
1141 Views
Nonsense
- 11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
1200 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
645 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
- 11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
730 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
- 12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
1167 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
- 12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
1041 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
- 12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
1086 Views
It doesn't matter.
- 12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
1066 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
- 13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
1131 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
- 13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
1225 Views
- 13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
1225 Views
Because they're more powerful
- 12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
1354 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
- 12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
1135 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
- 12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
1134 Views
because the sith actively seek to become more powerful
- 14/08/2010 12:47:46 AM
1041 Views
Also they exist in tension with each other.
- 16/08/2010 06:17:05 PM
1341 Views

*NM*