to discover every useable bit knowledge of force whereas the jedi do not
Their adversarial development style means that as individuals, they are more combat oriented. Also, they are the underground types striking out at the establishment. Presumably they pick fights they think they can win.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
- 11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
1703 Views
To make them a scary menace
- 11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
1258 Views
. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
738 Views
Precisely.
- 12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
1249 Views
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
- 12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
1614 Views
- 12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
1614 Views
Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
- 11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
1501 Views
- 12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
1205 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
- 11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
1334 Views
Mno
- 11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
1292 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
- 11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
1266 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
- 11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
724 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
- 16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
851 Views
- 12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
1205 Views
It makes sense
- 12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
1309 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
- 12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
1088 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
- 13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
1285 Views
Not they don't Edited
- 11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
1225 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
761 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
- 12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
563 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
- 11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
695 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
- 11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
1180 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying.
- 11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
1185 Views
- 11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
1185 Views
Nonsense
- 11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
1272 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
- 12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
667 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
- 11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
752 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
- 12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
1214 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
- 12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
1092 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
- 12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
1137 Views
It doesn't matter.
- 12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
1114 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
- 13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
1191 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
- 13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
1286 Views
- 13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
1286 Views
Because they're more powerful
- 12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
1413 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
- 12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
1187 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
- 12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
1188 Views
because the sith actively seek to become more powerful
- 14/08/2010 12:47:46 AM
1095 Views
Also they exist in tension with each other.
- 16/08/2010 06:17:05 PM
1384 Views

*NM*