Active Users:657 Time:02/05/2026 03:54:38 PM
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM
You didn't accidentally try the pilot, did you? Because that is atrocious. But Babylon 5 is also one of those shows which grows into itself. They are all a little stiff in the beginning, but it gets better.


Lol. It wasn't an accident. The look made me think of Beast Wars. I would think a full hour sci-fi show should have a better look than a thirty minute kid's show.

It lasted two seasons!


They were really short seasons though weren't they? Thirteen episodes each like The Sarah Connor Chronicles?

They are not science fiction. Both are ... I suppose you could call them detective shows with humour, but it does not cover it. Nathan Fillion from Firefly is the main character in Castle. The other one is about a con artist who helps the FBI.

The reason why I suggested them is that you listed House.


So you listed them because of the humor? Or because someone on each show is a douche in a funny way like Greg House?
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
Is there a website where...? - 13/12/2010 04:18:51 PM 898 Views
Er... right here? - 13/12/2010 04:26:54 PM 665 Views
Re: Er... right here? *final edit?* - 13/12/2010 04:48:26 PM 636 Views
Here's some to look into - 13/12/2010 06:39:42 PM 798 Views
Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 06:50:11 PM 725 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:30:13 PM 833 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:24:52 PM 670 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:50:36 PM 655 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:05:04 PM 696 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:10:00 PM 723 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:13:33 PM 772 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:23:15 PM 735 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:31:04 PM 663 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:38:55 PM 606 Views
Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:45:57 PM 614 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:51:21 PM 613 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:56:32 PM 742 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM 647 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:13:48 PM 663 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:19:24 PM 654 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:25:02 PM 640 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:30:23 PM 713 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:35:43 PM 714 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:52:19 PM 742 Views
Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:13:22 PM 642 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:16:21 PM 779 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 14/12/2010 12:47:12 AM 775 Views
Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 09:21:15 PM 782 Views
Re: Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 10:37:37 PM 744 Views
We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 10:48:58 PM 689 Views
Re: We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 11:02:19 PM 669 Views
FWIW, Angel is a much better character on his own show than he was on Buffy. *NM* - 13/12/2010 11:17:50 PM 709 Views
I never liked him because he was a vampire sleeping with the Slayer. - 13/12/2010 11:52:21 PM 634 Views
Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 12:49:49 AM 587 Views
Re: Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 03:58:09 AM 643 Views
SUPERNATURAL - 21/12/2010 01:48:36 AM 674 Views
seconded, the villains are actually quite memorable. *NM* - 21/12/2010 06:39:35 AM 285 Views
Azazael FTW! *NM* - 22/12/2010 06:09:59 PM 290 Views
Lucy and Crowley too, IMO. *NM* - 22/12/2010 07:17:46 PM 278 Views
Damn right *NM* - 13/12/2010 07:51:56 PM 295 Views
Netflix tries to do this - 13/12/2010 08:43:02 PM 610 Views
I don't use Netfix. - 13/12/2010 08:47:27 PM 655 Views
it is worth it just for the watch instantly shows - 22/12/2010 06:18:29 PM 653 Views

Reply to Message