Active Users:1237 Time:31/07/2026 07:30:43 PM
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM
You didn't accidentally try the pilot, did you? Because that is atrocious. But Babylon 5 is also one of those shows which grows into itself. They are all a little stiff in the beginning, but it gets better.


Lol. It wasn't an accident. The look made me think of Beast Wars. I would think a full hour sci-fi show should have a better look than a thirty minute kid's show.

It lasted two seasons!


They were really short seasons though weren't they? Thirteen episodes each like The Sarah Connor Chronicles?

They are not science fiction. Both are ... I suppose you could call them detective shows with humour, but it does not cover it. Nathan Fillion from Firefly is the main character in Castle. The other one is about a con artist who helps the FBI.

The reason why I suggested them is that you listed House.


So you listed them because of the humor? Or because someone on each show is a douche in a funny way like Greg House?
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
Is there a website where...? - 13/12/2010 04:18:51 PM 934 Views
Er... right here? - 13/12/2010 04:26:54 PM 692 Views
Re: Er... right here? *final edit?* - 13/12/2010 04:48:26 PM 674 Views
Here's some to look into - 13/12/2010 06:39:42 PM 824 Views
Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 06:50:11 PM 750 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:30:13 PM 856 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:24:52 PM 697 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:50:36 PM 687 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:05:04 PM 729 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:10:00 PM 755 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:13:33 PM 798 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:23:15 PM 770 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:31:04 PM 691 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:38:55 PM 635 Views
Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:45:57 PM 641 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:51:21 PM 637 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:56:32 PM 768 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM 672 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:13:48 PM 696 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:19:24 PM 689 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:25:02 PM 674 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:30:23 PM 742 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:35:43 PM 743 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:52:19 PM 784 Views
Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:13:22 PM 676 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:16:21 PM 812 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 14/12/2010 12:47:12 AM 807 Views
Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 09:21:15 PM 819 Views
Re: Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 10:37:37 PM 777 Views
We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 10:48:58 PM 726 Views
Re: We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 11:02:19 PM 711 Views
FWIW, Angel is a much better character on his own show than he was on Buffy. *NM* - 13/12/2010 11:17:50 PM 743 Views
I never liked him because he was a vampire sleeping with the Slayer. - 13/12/2010 11:52:21 PM 662 Views
Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 12:49:49 AM 614 Views
Re: Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 03:58:09 AM 673 Views
SUPERNATURAL - 21/12/2010 01:48:36 AM 702 Views
seconded, the villains are actually quite memorable. *NM* - 21/12/2010 06:39:35 AM 298 Views
Azazael FTW! *NM* - 22/12/2010 06:09:59 PM 306 Views
Lucy and Crowley too, IMO. *NM* - 22/12/2010 07:17:46 PM 293 Views
Damn right *NM* - 13/12/2010 07:51:56 PM 309 Views
Netflix tries to do this - 13/12/2010 08:43:02 PM 644 Views
I don't use Netfix. - 13/12/2010 08:47:27 PM 697 Views
it is worth it just for the watch instantly shows - 22/12/2010 06:18:29 PM 684 Views

Reply to Message