Active Users:586 Time:30/10/2026 08:11:53 AM
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM
You didn't accidentally try the pilot, did you? Because that is atrocious. But Babylon 5 is also one of those shows which grows into itself. They are all a little stiff in the beginning, but it gets better.


Lol. It wasn't an accident. The look made me think of Beast Wars. I would think a full hour sci-fi show should have a better look than a thirty minute kid's show.

It lasted two seasons!


They were really short seasons though weren't they? Thirteen episodes each like The Sarah Connor Chronicles?

They are not science fiction. Both are ... I suppose you could call them detective shows with humour, but it does not cover it. Nathan Fillion from Firefly is the main character in Castle. The other one is about a con artist who helps the FBI.

The reason why I suggested them is that you listed House.


So you listed them because of the humor? Or because someone on each show is a douche in a funny way like Greg House?
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
Is there a website where...? - 13/12/2010 04:18:51 PM 972 Views
Er... right here? - 13/12/2010 04:26:54 PM 733 Views
Re: Er... right here? *final edit?* - 13/12/2010 04:48:26 PM 711 Views
Here's some to look into - 13/12/2010 06:39:42 PM 871 Views
Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 06:50:11 PM 788 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:30:13 PM 908 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:24:52 PM 741 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:50:36 PM 724 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:05:04 PM 766 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:10:00 PM 796 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:13:33 PM 840 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:23:15 PM 812 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:31:04 PM 730 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:38:55 PM 678 Views
Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:45:57 PM 677 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:51:21 PM 681 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:56:32 PM 801 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM 708 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:13:48 PM 740 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:19:24 PM 727 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:25:02 PM 717 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:30:23 PM 777 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:35:43 PM 783 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:52:19 PM 817 Views
Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:13:22 PM 722 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:16:21 PM 853 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 14/12/2010 12:47:12 AM 840 Views
Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 09:21:15 PM 857 Views
Re: Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 10:37:37 PM 824 Views
We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 10:48:58 PM 773 Views
Re: We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 11:02:19 PM 747 Views
FWIW, Angel is a much better character on his own show than he was on Buffy. *NM* - 13/12/2010 11:17:50 PM 782 Views
I never liked him because he was a vampire sleeping with the Slayer. - 13/12/2010 11:52:21 PM 697 Views
Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 12:49:49 AM 655 Views
Re: Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 03:58:09 AM 711 Views
SUPERNATURAL - 21/12/2010 01:48:36 AM 737 Views
seconded, the villains are actually quite memorable. *NM* - 21/12/2010 06:39:35 AM 317 Views
Azazael FTW! *NM* - 22/12/2010 06:09:59 PM 326 Views
Lucy and Crowley too, IMO. *NM* - 22/12/2010 07:17:46 PM 313 Views
Damn right *NM* - 13/12/2010 07:51:56 PM 328 Views
Netflix tries to do this - 13/12/2010 08:43:02 PM 691 Views
I don't use Netfix. - 13/12/2010 08:47:27 PM 736 Views
it is worth it just for the watch instantly shows - 22/12/2010 06:18:29 PM 723 Views

Reply to Message