Active Users:706 Time:18/03/2026 08:33:50 AM
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM
You didn't accidentally try the pilot, did you? Because that is atrocious. But Babylon 5 is also one of those shows which grows into itself. They are all a little stiff in the beginning, but it gets better.


Lol. It wasn't an accident. The look made me think of Beast Wars. I would think a full hour sci-fi show should have a better look than a thirty minute kid's show.

It lasted two seasons!


They were really short seasons though weren't they? Thirteen episodes each like The Sarah Connor Chronicles?

They are not science fiction. Both are ... I suppose you could call them detective shows with humour, but it does not cover it. Nathan Fillion from Firefly is the main character in Castle. The other one is about a con artist who helps the FBI.

The reason why I suggested them is that you listed House.


So you listed them because of the humor? Or because someone on each show is a douche in a funny way like Greg House?
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
Is there a website where...? - 13/12/2010 04:18:51 PM 879 Views
Er... right here? - 13/12/2010 04:26:54 PM 644 Views
Re: Er... right here? *final edit?* - 13/12/2010 04:48:26 PM 618 Views
Here's some to look into - 13/12/2010 06:39:42 PM 776 Views
Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 06:50:11 PM 703 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:30:13 PM 793 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:24:52 PM 645 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:50:36 PM 632 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:05:04 PM 670 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:10:00 PM 698 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:13:33 PM 743 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:23:15 PM 713 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:31:04 PM 633 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:38:55 PM 580 Views
Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:45:57 PM 588 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:51:21 PM 589 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:56:32 PM 712 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM 627 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:13:48 PM 645 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:19:24 PM 630 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:25:02 PM 616 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:30:23 PM 686 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:35:43 PM 692 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:52:19 PM 722 Views
Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:13:22 PM 620 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:16:21 PM 749 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 14/12/2010 12:47:12 AM 755 Views
Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 09:21:15 PM 760 Views
Re: Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 10:37:37 PM 719 Views
We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 10:48:58 PM 664 Views
Re: We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 11:02:19 PM 648 Views
FWIW, Angel is a much better character on his own show than he was on Buffy. *NM* - 13/12/2010 11:17:50 PM 686 Views
I never liked him because he was a vampire sleeping with the Slayer. - 13/12/2010 11:52:21 PM 608 Views
Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 12:49:49 AM 560 Views
Re: Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 03:58:09 AM 619 Views
SUPERNATURAL - 21/12/2010 01:48:36 AM 648 Views
seconded, the villains are actually quite memorable. *NM* - 21/12/2010 06:39:35 AM 272 Views
Azazael FTW! *NM* - 22/12/2010 06:09:59 PM 276 Views
Lucy and Crowley too, IMO. *NM* - 22/12/2010 07:17:46 PM 261 Views
Damn right *NM* - 13/12/2010 07:51:56 PM 283 Views
Netflix tries to do this - 13/12/2010 08:43:02 PM 590 Views
I don't use Netfix. - 13/12/2010 08:47:27 PM 636 Views
it is worth it just for the watch instantly shows - 22/12/2010 06:18:29 PM 628 Views

Reply to Message