Active Users:1180 Time:16/12/2025 01:12:29 PM
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM
You didn't accidentally try the pilot, did you? Because that is atrocious. But Babylon 5 is also one of those shows which grows into itself. They are all a little stiff in the beginning, but it gets better.


Lol. It wasn't an accident. The look made me think of Beast Wars. I would think a full hour sci-fi show should have a better look than a thirty minute kid's show.

It lasted two seasons!


They were really short seasons though weren't they? Thirteen episodes each like The Sarah Connor Chronicles?

They are not science fiction. Both are ... I suppose you could call them detective shows with humour, but it does not cover it. Nathan Fillion from Firefly is the main character in Castle. The other one is about a con artist who helps the FBI.

The reason why I suggested them is that you listed House.


So you listed them because of the humor? Or because someone on each show is a douche in a funny way like Greg House?
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
Is there a website where...? - 13/12/2010 04:18:51 PM 846 Views
Er... right here? - 13/12/2010 04:26:54 PM 617 Views
Re: Er... right here? *final edit?* - 13/12/2010 04:48:26 PM 591 Views
Here's some to look into - 13/12/2010 06:39:42 PM 748 Views
Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 06:50:11 PM 680 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:30:13 PM 759 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:24:52 PM 621 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:50:36 PM 605 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:05:04 PM 641 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:10:00 PM 675 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:13:33 PM 698 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:23:15 PM 685 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:31:04 PM 600 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:38:55 PM 557 Views
Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:45:57 PM 562 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:51:21 PM 557 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:56:32 PM 686 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM 603 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:13:48 PM 619 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:19:24 PM 602 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:25:02 PM 589 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:30:23 PM 663 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:35:43 PM 663 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:52:19 PM 689 Views
Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:13:22 PM 595 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:16:21 PM 725 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 14/12/2010 12:47:12 AM 726 Views
Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 09:21:15 PM 731 Views
Re: Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 10:37:37 PM 691 Views
We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 10:48:58 PM 636 Views
Re: We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 11:02:19 PM 614 Views
FWIW, Angel is a much better character on his own show than he was on Buffy. *NM* - 13/12/2010 11:17:50 PM 655 Views
I never liked him because he was a vampire sleeping with the Slayer. - 13/12/2010 11:52:21 PM 586 Views
Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 12:49:49 AM 530 Views
Re: Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 03:58:09 AM 592 Views
SUPERNATURAL - 21/12/2010 01:48:36 AM 623 Views
seconded, the villains are actually quite memorable. *NM* - 21/12/2010 06:39:35 AM 261 Views
Azazael FTW! *NM* - 22/12/2010 06:09:59 PM 264 Views
Lucy and Crowley too, IMO. *NM* - 22/12/2010 07:17:46 PM 250 Views
Damn right *NM* - 13/12/2010 07:51:56 PM 271 Views
Netflix tries to do this - 13/12/2010 08:43:02 PM 565 Views
I don't use Netfix. - 13/12/2010 08:47:27 PM 603 Views
it is worth it just for the watch instantly shows - 22/12/2010 06:18:29 PM 605 Views

Reply to Message