Active Users:1771 Time:23/10/2025 06:11:44 AM
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) j-whitt987 Send a noteboard - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM
You didn't accidentally try the pilot, did you? Because that is atrocious. But Babylon 5 is also one of those shows which grows into itself. They are all a little stiff in the beginning, but it gets better.


Lol. It wasn't an accident. The look made me think of Beast Wars. I would think a full hour sci-fi show should have a better look than a thirty minute kid's show.

It lasted two seasons!


They were really short seasons though weren't they? Thirteen episodes each like The Sarah Connor Chronicles?

They are not science fiction. Both are ... I suppose you could call them detective shows with humour, but it does not cover it. Nathan Fillion from Firefly is the main character in Castle. The other one is about a con artist who helps the FBI.

The reason why I suggested them is that you listed House.


So you listed them because of the humor? Or because someone on each show is a douche in a funny way like Greg House?
Kirk: Spock, you want to know something? Everybody’s human.
Spock: I find that remark…insulting.
Reply to message
Is there a website where...? - 13/12/2010 04:18:51 PM 820 Views
Er... right here? - 13/12/2010 04:26:54 PM 594 Views
Re: Er... right here? *final edit?* - 13/12/2010 04:48:26 PM 566 Views
Here's some to look into - 13/12/2010 06:39:42 PM 720 Views
Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 06:50:11 PM 650 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:30:13 PM 723 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:24:52 PM 597 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 07:50:36 PM 576 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:05:04 PM 618 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:10:00 PM 650 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 08:13:33 PM 670 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:23:15 PM 660 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:31:04 PM 576 Views
Re: Tried most of them - 13/12/2010 10:38:55 PM 530 Views
Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:45:57 PM 535 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:51:21 PM 534 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 07:56:32 PM 656 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:10:22 PM 578 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:13:48 PM 591 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:19:24 PM 578 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:25:02 PM 564 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:30:23 PM 638 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:35:43 PM 641 Views
Re: Babylon 5 (old, but good) - 13/12/2010 08:52:19 PM 668 Views
Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:13:22 PM 559 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 13/12/2010 09:16:21 PM 700 Views
Re: Fringe. Farscape. Maybe Buffy the Vampire Slayer? - 14/12/2010 12:47:12 AM 693 Views
Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 09:21:15 PM 702 Views
Re: Also, if you want some lighter fare: - 13/12/2010 10:37:37 PM 667 Views
We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 10:48:58 PM 608 Views
Re: We seem to have very similar tastes. Recommendations inside. - 13/12/2010 11:02:19 PM 588 Views
FWIW, Angel is a much better character on his own show than he was on Buffy. *NM* - 13/12/2010 11:17:50 PM 625 Views
I never liked him because he was a vampire sleeping with the Slayer. - 13/12/2010 11:52:21 PM 564 Views
Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 12:49:49 AM 508 Views
Re: Earth 2. Space: Above and Beyond. SeaQuest DSV. Invisible Man. - 14/12/2010 03:58:09 AM 567 Views
SUPERNATURAL - 21/12/2010 01:48:36 AM 602 Views
seconded, the villains are actually quite memorable. *NM* - 21/12/2010 06:39:35 AM 250 Views
Azazael FTW! *NM* - 22/12/2010 06:09:59 PM 254 Views
Lucy and Crowley too, IMO. *NM* - 22/12/2010 07:17:46 PM 240 Views
Damn right *NM* - 13/12/2010 07:51:56 PM 262 Views
Netflix tries to do this - 13/12/2010 08:43:02 PM 535 Views
I don't use Netfix. - 13/12/2010 08:47:27 PM 578 Views
it is worth it just for the watch instantly shows - 22/12/2010 06:18:29 PM 578 Views

Reply to Message