IMO, it also doesn't seem to make much sense that the especially careful Graendal would stroll through the basement of the mostly empty Caemlyn palace - with no servants there - without any disguise, but of course balefire prepared (though for some reason not inverted), since the possibility remained that instead of Asmo, e.g. Rand had opened the door to see her (and we know that the last Graendal wants is to confront Rand in his territory).
1. Why would she bother with a disguise in a place no one would recognize her anyway? Just like at the Cleansing she was simply strolling around the forest with no disguise.
2. Why are you assuming she didn't invert the weaves? Seems much more likely that she did since no once felt anything at Asmo's death. Asmo wouldn't have needed to feel the weaves being prepared to know she was about to kill him ... all he had to see was her raise her hand to release it and he would have screamed.
3. Graendal seems the most likely of the FS to do something like this, we know that she later rummaged through Sammael's stuff in Illian ... I don't think we've seen any of the others do something like this.
Besides that, Moiraine apparently used very weak balefire, but it was obviously still strong enough to prevent a transmigration of Be'lal. A Forsaken like Graendal should per se use stronger balefire, especially if she might confront her arch-enemy or a Forsaken rival, precisely to exclude that the DO might perform a transmigration. And if her balefire was nevertheless just minimal, the DO could transmigrate Asmo everywhere, according to RJ's words on balefire.
To explain the how- and where-factors with balefire would mean that RJ basically said that - by chance - balefire in such an amount was used that, if Graendal had theoretically killed Asmo at SG, the DO still could have transmigrated him. This "not at SG-location" doesn't really fit a concrete and sensible where-factor, because SG was anyway never in question to be the location of Asmo's murder.
To explain the how- and where-factors with balefire would mean that RJ basically said that - by chance - balefire in such an amount was used that, if Graendal had theoretically killed Asmo at SG, the DO still could have transmigrated him. This "not at SG-location" doesn't really fit a concrete and sensible where-factor, because SG was anyway never in question to be the location of Asmo's murder.
4. Why did the weave have to be balefire? She could have used a number of nasty weaves to kill him quickly and simply disposed of his body in TAR or AD etc... The DO isn't likely to transmigrate a complete turn-coat in any case so it doesn't seem like that BF is the only reason Asmo isn't back!
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean.
- 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM
1542 Views
It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM
1147 Views
Re: It's unlikely
- 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM
1159 Views
Well...
- 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM
1123 Views
A few points
- 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM
913 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM
999 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM
963 Views
Re: A few points
- 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM
945 Views
Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM
1016 Views
Re: Actually I believe...
- 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM
985 Views
I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM
906 Views
Re: I think...
- 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM
875 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM
434 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR.
- 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM
893 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM
395 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference
- 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM
931 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM*
- 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM
407 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy.
- 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM
853 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view
- 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM
918 Views
That doesn't make sense
- 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM
880 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer.
- 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM
822 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be
- 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM
939 Views
You confuse two things...
- 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM
838 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought
- 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM
853 Views
I argue...
- 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM
1035 Views
we don't know any of that until WH
- 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM
1026 Views
Your explanation how the "where" is significant matches what I've been saying for awhile, too. *NM*
- 29/05/2010 09:49:02 PM
449 Views
You disregard Jordan's explanations about the Finns... and some others...
- 26/05/2010 12:50:30 PM
1089 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM
927 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM
925 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM
931 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick
- 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM
952 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =)
- 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM
876 Views
Re: I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien
- 26/05/2010 02:24:44 PM
1003 Views