How many Damane are actually out there?
RJ said between 1-2% of the population had the ability. There's what 20M Seanchan? That's about 150k women with the ability. RJ also claimed that there is a much smaller portion of "sparkers" ... so what 25% of the total? That makes about 37.5k damane and 112.5k sul'dam? Seems like an excessively high number of damane. if they had that many they would have crushed even Rand and the Asha'man in no time ... perhaps it's more like 12% are sparkers, meaning 18k damane and 132k sul'dam? That seems to be a little more realistic since there have been battles with several hundred damane on each side, with the Forerunners bringing a couple of thousand along with them...
Obviously there are huge flaws here since damane can live for hundreds of years which would make for more larger numbers, but there likely a ton of casualties from all the unification wars to even that out. I'm also totally guessing at the Seanchan population
RJ said between 1-2% of the population had the ability. There's what 20M Seanchan? That's about 150k women with the ability. RJ also claimed that there is a much smaller portion of "sparkers" ... so what 25% of the total? That makes about 37.5k damane and 112.5k sul'dam? Seems like an excessively high number of damane. if they had that many they would have crushed even Rand and the Asha'man in no time ... perhaps it's more like 12% are sparkers, meaning 18k damane and 132k sul'dam? That seems to be a little more realistic since there have been battles with several hundred damane on each side, with the Forerunners bringing a couple of thousand along with them...
Obviously there are huge flaws here since damane can live for hundreds of years which would make for more larger numbers, but there likely a ton of casualties from all the unification wars to even that out. I'm also totally guessing at the Seanchan population

I touched on this in one of my earlier messages in this thread.
I have no clue about proper numbers for population, but Mats imaginary friend had this to say earlier and he seemed to know what he was talking about:
I can only speculate about the food production levels of the Seanchan Empire, but given what seems to be a much higher level of organization and the greater stability that they enjoy, I would think that they could easily have been near the thresh-hold that any society would reach prior to
the industrial revolution. The Ming Empire in the mid 17th century had an estimated population of 150 million and that was pre-industrial revolution, so Seanchan could potentially be comparable in size.
So lets say 150 million people total over the entire continent.
Now lets see the RJ quote that he made about channeler numbers:
- For Papazen, while I have spoken of souls being born with the ability to channel in response to questions, I think of it as being genetic also. In the Age of Legends, between 2 and 3% of people had some ability, following a bell curve distribution in strength. For over 3000 years, though, Aes Sedai have been removing men who actually learned to channel from the gene pool. They have been very efficient at this. As a result, the “present day” sees about 1% of the population who can learn to channel, with a much, much smaller percentage of that being born with the spark.
Seems likely that the Seanchan with the damane not having children, male sparkers hunted down and killed, and the sul'dam likely not leading normal family lives, will all also result on culling the ability so the 1% is likely accurate for the Seanchan too.
RJ unfortunately does not clarify about sparkers. That could mean that something like 0.1% of the population have the spark. Or it could mean that say 1% of channelers(who are already rare to begin with) will also have the spark. Which would reduce numbers even further.
Even so, considering the long lifespan of the damane due to no oaths, the testing that will find everyone, and the fact that rebellions and the like will likely not have caused any significant loss in the damane numbers, the Seanchan likely have a LOT of channelers at their disposal.
Obviously however the Seanchan did not have traveling when they arrived, so they could not fill their ships to the brim with channelers, they could only bring a limited supply with them.
Ofcourse that has changed now. I mentioned in another message that Rand should actually be thanking Semirhage. If not for her killing the Empress&co and throwing the entire Seanchan into chaos and civil war, Tuon could likely have used traveling to summon virtually all the damane in Seanchan to support her and utterly crushed Rand, the Aes Sedai and pretty much everyone else with ease. That however will no longer work. Her authority back home has been destroyed and she has to rely on the numbers she already has.
Seanchan girls. Do they live in terror until 25?
- 02/06/2010 12:32:14 AM
1675 Views
It's a huge honor to be a sul'dam, and they test for that on the same day
- 02/06/2010 01:06:32 AM
1009 Views
Re: It's a huge honor to be a sul'dam, and they test for that on the same day
- 02/06/2010 01:50:49 AM
1037 Views
Re: It's a huge honor to be a sul'dam, and they test for that on the same day
- 02/06/2010 05:53:14 AM
1014 Views
Re: It's a huge honor to be a sul'dam, and they test for that on the same day
- 04/06/2010 07:19:36 PM
864 Views
A few details to consider
- 02/06/2010 01:11:12 AM
1032 Views
Re: A few details to consider
- 02/06/2010 02:31:08 AM
1018 Views
Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics
- 02/06/2010 08:57:43 PM
869 Views
Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics
- 03/06/2010 03:38:25 AM
695 Views
Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics
- 04/06/2010 07:46:08 PM
778 Views
Nobody knows about Sul'dam because it takes them extra long to learn.
- 03/06/2010 07:58:41 AM
1172 Views
I think they retest only the sul'dam
- 02/06/2010 04:13:55 AM
1068 Views
I'll have to check my EotW, but I think Eg did have some fevers before Winternight. *NM*
- 02/06/2010 06:34:35 PM
441 Views
Re: I think they retest only the sul'dam
- 04/06/2010 07:55:56 PM
870 Views
Point on the testing
- 08/06/2010 02:15:26 AM
824 Views
Re: Point on the testing
- 08/06/2010 02:46:06 PM
898 Views
I'd think that would be a tiny chance given how diligent the Seanchan are in this regard
- 08/06/2010 02:58:15 PM
1020 Views
Remember, Seancean have no idea channeling can be "learned"
- 02/06/2010 07:04:11 AM
972 Views
This is how Damane and Sul'Dam are determined, straight from tGH
- 03/06/2010 08:14:03 AM
1535 Views
That doesn't make sense. Are you sure they don't put the BRACELET on the girls, not the collar?
- 04/06/2010 01:35:08 AM
843 Views
I am absolutely sure. Quote from book.
- 04/06/2010 03:09:08 AM
923 Views
Toun, though too young can be collared
- 06/06/2010 03:29:29 AM
779 Views
I don't think Tuon will ever Channel
- 06/06/2010 03:39:16 AM
929 Views
Re: I don't think Tuon will ever Channel
- 06/06/2010 05:07:40 AM
791 Views
I just see all of that as potential plot lines for the planned follow-up Mat/Tuon in Seanchan novels
- 08/06/2010 02:09:26 AM
977 Views
Not at all
- 02/06/2010 03:52:31 PM
782 Views
As with most things in Jordan's universe, I don't think it was thought through very seriously.
- 03/06/2010 08:05:04 PM
817 Views
Huh?
- 03/06/2010 08:44:35 PM
914 Views
Sure
- 03/06/2010 09:00:40 PM
940 Views
Bah...
- 03/06/2010 09:51:09 PM
870 Views
Jordan definitely made mistakes with the Ajahs. In particular, the Black Ajah ones who fled.
- 03/06/2010 10:56:39 PM
859 Views
Re: Sure
- 04/06/2010 04:55:23 AM
965 Views
I don't know if that's totally true
- 04/06/2010 12:09:29 PM
816 Views
Maybe you don't read that much serious literature? I just don't see why you are arguing this.
- 04/06/2010 03:47:50 PM
796 Views
I actually don't read much fiction at all to be honest
- 04/06/2010 04:00:03 PM
825 Views
You're right about the fact that I have mostly contempt for Jordan.
- 04/06/2010 05:42:49 PM
811 Views
Meh
- 04/06/2010 05:03:41 PM
846 Views
I love that: "I'm convinced Rand al'Thor is the most monotonous man in the world."
- 04/06/2010 05:47:01 PM
746 Views
I think the number of characters directly contributes to the situation.
- 04/06/2010 03:51:42 PM
751 Views
Re: I think the number of characters directly contributes to the situation.
- 04/06/2010 05:04:52 PM
701 Views
Brandon brings out supporting chars. better, it's true.
- 04/06/2010 03:17:52 AM
851 Views
You're absolutely right. Sanderson gets "inside" the characters a bit more. *NM*
- 04/06/2010 03:52:29 PM
336 Views
This raises another question
- 06/06/2010 04:13:25 AM
759 Views
Re: This raises another question
- 06/06/2010 04:53:42 AM
858 Views
