Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics
Datakim Send a noteboard - 04/06/2010 07:46:08 PM
Well, yes, you make a valid point, but it's been close to 1000 years since Luthair Pendrag leashed the first damane, or at the very least, several hundreds of years. In all that time, no one put two-and-two together and realized that sul'dam and damane run in families, however infrequently? It speaks of an incredibly close-minded culture, with a self-imposed thought police.
RJ said:
For Papazen, while I have spoken of souls being born with the ability to channel in response to questions, I think of it as being genetic also. In the Age of Legends, between 2 and 3% of people had some ability, following a bell curve distribution in strength. For over 3000 years, though, Aes Sedai have been removing men who actually learned to channel from the gene pool. They have been very efficient at this. As a result, the “present day” sees about 1% of the population who can learn to channel, with a much, much smaller percentage of that being born with the spark.
In order for the connection to be truly noticed, it would have to happen quite regularly. Given those numbers, it is likely that damane being discovered is much rarer than I originally thought. It could be that the Seanchan realise that being sul'dam runs in families, but damane are likely so rare that even in a channeler family it only happens rarely. If your great-great-great-grandmother was a sparker, and you have a sparker as a child, you are likely not to make the connection.
Seanchan girls. Do they live in terror until 25?
- 02/06/2010 12:32:14 AM
1785 Views
It's a huge honor to be a sul'dam, and they test for that on the same day
- 02/06/2010 01:06:32 AM
1106 Views
Re: It's a huge honor to be a sul'dam, and they test for that on the same day
- 02/06/2010 01:50:49 AM
1161 Views
Re: It's a huge honor to be a sul'dam, and they test for that on the same day
- 02/06/2010 05:53:14 AM
1131 Views
Re: It's a huge honor to be a sul'dam, and they test for that on the same day
- 04/06/2010 07:19:36 PM
983 Views
A few details to consider
- 02/06/2010 01:11:12 AM
1141 Views
Re: A few details to consider
- 02/06/2010 02:31:08 AM
1152 Views
Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics
- 02/06/2010 08:57:43 PM
997 Views
Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics
- 03/06/2010 03:38:25 AM
816 Views
Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics
- 04/06/2010 07:46:08 PM
884 Views
Nobody knows about Sul'dam because it takes them extra long to learn.
- 03/06/2010 07:58:41 AM
1309 Views
I think they retest only the sul'dam
- 02/06/2010 04:13:55 AM
1189 Views
I'll have to check my EotW, but I think Eg did have some fevers before Winternight. *NM*
- 02/06/2010 06:34:35 PM
496 Views
Re: I think they retest only the sul'dam
- 04/06/2010 07:55:56 PM
984 Views
Point on the testing
- 08/06/2010 02:15:26 AM
944 Views
Re: Point on the testing
- 08/06/2010 02:46:06 PM
998 Views
I'd think that would be a tiny chance given how diligent the Seanchan are in this regard
- 08/06/2010 02:58:15 PM
1136 Views
Remember, Seancean have no idea channeling can be "learned"
- 02/06/2010 07:04:11 AM
1096 Views
This is how Damane and Sul'Dam are determined, straight from tGH
- 03/06/2010 08:14:03 AM
1962 Views
That doesn't make sense. Are you sure they don't put the BRACELET on the girls, not the collar?
- 04/06/2010 01:35:08 AM
968 Views
I am absolutely sure. Quote from book.
- 04/06/2010 03:09:08 AM
1043 Views
Toun, though too young can be collared
- 06/06/2010 03:29:29 AM
890 Views
I don't think Tuon will ever Channel
- 06/06/2010 03:39:16 AM
1039 Views
Re: I don't think Tuon will ever Channel
- 06/06/2010 05:07:40 AM
899 Views
I just see all of that as potential plot lines for the planned follow-up Mat/Tuon in Seanchan novels
- 08/06/2010 02:09:26 AM
1112 Views
Not at all
- 02/06/2010 03:52:31 PM
907 Views
As with most things in Jordan's universe, I don't think it was thought through very seriously.
- 03/06/2010 08:05:04 PM
926 Views
Huh?
- 03/06/2010 08:44:35 PM
1026 Views
Sure
- 03/06/2010 09:00:40 PM
1068 Views
Bah...
- 03/06/2010 09:51:09 PM
967 Views
Jordan definitely made mistakes with the Ajahs. In particular, the Black Ajah ones who fled.
- 03/06/2010 10:56:39 PM
978 Views
Re: Sure
- 04/06/2010 04:55:23 AM
1077 Views
I don't know if that's totally true
- 04/06/2010 12:09:29 PM
926 Views
Maybe you don't read that much serious literature? I just don't see why you are arguing this.
- 04/06/2010 03:47:50 PM
912 Views
I actually don't read much fiction at all to be honest
- 04/06/2010 04:00:03 PM
947 Views
You're right about the fact that I have mostly contempt for Jordan.
- 04/06/2010 05:42:49 PM
924 Views
Meh
- 04/06/2010 05:03:41 PM
967 Views
I love that: "I'm convinced Rand al'Thor is the most monotonous man in the world."
- 04/06/2010 05:47:01 PM
876 Views
I think the number of characters directly contributes to the situation.
- 04/06/2010 03:51:42 PM
873 Views
Re: I think the number of characters directly contributes to the situation.
- 04/06/2010 05:04:52 PM
820 Views
Brandon brings out supporting chars. better, it's true.
- 04/06/2010 03:17:52 AM
968 Views
You're absolutely right. Sanderson gets "inside" the characters a bit more. *NM*
- 04/06/2010 03:52:29 PM
397 Views
