Active Users:456 Time:02/06/2026 10:31:55 PM
Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics Datakim Send a noteboard - 04/06/2010 07:46:08 PM
Well, yes, you make a valid point, but it's been close to 1000 years since Luthair Pendrag leashed the first damane, or at the very least, several hundreds of years. In all that time, no one put two-and-two together and realized that sul'dam and damane run in families, however infrequently? It speaks of an incredibly close-minded culture, with a self-imposed thought police.


RJ said:

For Papazen, while I have spoken of souls being born with the ability to channel in response to questions, I think of it as being genetic also. In the Age of Legends, between 2 and 3% of people had some ability, following a bell curve distribution in strength. For over 3000 years, though, Aes Sedai have been removing men who actually learned to channel from the gene pool. They have been very efficient at this. As a result, the “present day” sees about 1% of the population who can learn to channel, with a much, much smaller percentage of that being born with the spark.


In order for the connection to be truly noticed, it would have to happen quite regularly. Given those numbers, it is likely that damane being discovered is much rarer than I originally thought. It could be that the Seanchan realise that being sul'dam runs in families, but damane are likely so rare that even in a channeler family it only happens rarely. If your great-great-great-grandmother was a sparker, and you have a sparker as a child, you are likely not to make the connection.
Reply to message
Seanchan girls. Do they live in terror until 25? - 02/06/2010 12:32:14 AM 1701 Views
A few details to consider - 02/06/2010 01:11:12 AM 1057 Views
Re: A few details to consider - 02/06/2010 02:31:08 AM 1048 Views
Wasn't talking about breeding damane - 03/06/2010 03:32:44 AM 1044 Views
Re: Wasn't talking about breeding damane - 04/06/2010 07:30:55 PM 914 Views
Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics - 02/06/2010 08:57:43 PM 902 Views
Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics - 03/06/2010 03:38:25 AM 722 Views
Re: Well, it took centuries for most people to understand breeding/genetics - 04/06/2010 07:46:08 PM 804 Views
Nobody knows about Sul'dam because it takes them extra long to learn. - 03/06/2010 07:58:41 AM 1203 Views
Re: A few details to consider - 04/06/2010 07:33:39 AM 916 Views
I think it's seen as something that happens to other people. - 02/06/2010 02:20:09 AM 938 Views
I think they retest only the sul'dam - 02/06/2010 04:13:55 AM 1095 Views
Re: I think they retest only the sul'dam - 04/06/2010 07:55:56 PM 896 Views
Point on the testing - 08/06/2010 02:15:26 AM 855 Views
Re: Point on the testing - 08/06/2010 02:46:06 PM 922 Views
Remember, Seancean have no idea channeling can be "learned" - 02/06/2010 07:04:11 AM 1005 Views
This is how Damane and Sul'Dam are determined, straight from tGH - 03/06/2010 08:14:03 AM 1610 Views
That doesn't make sense. Are you sure they don't put the BRACELET on the girls, not the collar? - 04/06/2010 01:35:08 AM 880 Views
I am absolutely sure. Quote from book. - 04/06/2010 03:09:08 AM 957 Views
Re: I am absolutely sure. Quote from book. - 04/06/2010 11:54:25 AM 783 Views
Thanks Darius *NM* - 08/06/2010 01:48:28 AM 483 Views
Toun, though too young can be collared - 06/06/2010 03:29:29 AM 804 Views
I don't think Tuon will ever Channel - 06/06/2010 03:39:16 AM 965 Views
Everything points to a change in policy - 06/06/2010 04:04:33 AM 848 Views
Re: Everything points to a change in policy - 06/06/2010 04:18:21 AM 751 Views
Re: I don't think Tuon will ever Channel - 06/06/2010 05:07:40 AM 816 Views
Not at all - 02/06/2010 03:52:31 PM 806 Views
Re: Are the new damane actually tortured? - 02/06/2010 06:56:10 PM 977 Views
I think "tortured" is relative... - 03/06/2010 08:22:37 AM 916 Views
As with most things in Jordan's universe, I don't think it was thought through very seriously. - 03/06/2010 08:05:04 PM 838 Views
Huh? - 03/06/2010 08:44:35 PM 954 Views
Sure - 03/06/2010 09:00:40 PM 964 Views
Bah... - 03/06/2010 09:51:09 PM 891 Views
Jordan definitely made mistakes with the Ajahs. In particular, the Black Ajah ones who fled. - 03/06/2010 10:56:39 PM 894 Views
oh come now - 04/06/2010 12:58:44 AM 852 Views
Re: Sure - 04/06/2010 04:55:23 AM 996 Views
I don't know if that's totally true - 04/06/2010 12:09:29 PM 843 Views
Maybe you don't read that much serious literature? I just don't see why you are arguing this. - 04/06/2010 03:47:50 PM 826 Views
I actually don't read much fiction at all to be honest - 04/06/2010 04:00:03 PM 855 Views
You're right about the fact that I have mostly contempt for Jordan. - 04/06/2010 05:42:49 PM 842 Views
meh. I prefer non-fiction most of the time - 06/06/2010 03:44:38 AM 878 Views
I have read lots of fiction - 06/06/2010 03:57:07 AM 917 Views
Meh - 04/06/2010 05:03:41 PM 875 Views
LOL ... I hear ya on that - 06/06/2010 03:49:48 AM 896 Views
We've seen so little of the old tongue how can you tell? - 06/06/2010 03:33:46 AM 755 Views
This raises another question - 06/06/2010 04:13:25 AM 788 Views
Re: This raises another question - 06/06/2010 04:53:42 AM 883 Views

Reply to Message