Active Users:366 Time:01/05/2025 12:30:22 PM
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM
I think Brandon hinted that there is a way to defeat the Rod itself, not the whole Aes Sedai process around taking the Oath.

For some months now I have the following theory:
- to swear the Oath again, the Aes Sedai are un-swearing them;
- since Mesaana didn't swear any Oath, we actually don't know what happens when you are un-swearing them while never swearing in the first place;
- my theory is that such process creates a Oath-negative effect for the channeler, and when the channeler actually swears the Oath, its effect is cancelled by the Oath-negative effect;
- this may actually be tied to the physics of the Rod and so Brandon's words hold true.


However, Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones. She had oathes to the DO and as shown by the BA hunters the OR cancels those. I don't recall if the "unswearing" was ever fully depicted in the novels but I think it would be a simple "I forswear all oathes previously made"


No Forsaken took any Oath on the Rod. In fact, any regular Darkfriend never took any Oath. Except Black Ajah of course.

Black Ajah had access to the Rod and they NEED to look ageless, so, thus, the Black Ajah Oaths.
Reply to message
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM 3745 Views
I agree with Deadsy... - 17/07/2010 11:32:09 AM 1017 Views
could be - 17/07/2010 04:39:10 PM 900 Views
I wonder if masking one's ability messes with the OR - 17/07/2010 02:44:37 PM 984 Views
I don't think - 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM 1248 Views
Re: I don't think - 17/07/2010 07:26:57 PM 947 Views
Re: I don't think - 18/07/2010 06:13:59 PM 929 Views
Another AS does the channeling according to NS - 17/07/2010 10:02:32 PM 970 Views
And the Shaido "Wise Ones" channeled for Galina. *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:58:49 AM 523 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM 949 Views
That's an interesting theory - 18/07/2010 02:01:23 AM 939 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM 857 Views
Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 02:30:04 PM 778 Views
Re: Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 05:59:07 PM 805 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM 1072 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 837 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM 822 Views
Re: How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 18/07/2010 04:46:23 PM 795 Views
I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM 955 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM 983 Views
Is the Verin thing widely known? - 19/07/2010 05:51:05 AM 879 Views
Re: Is the Verin thing widely known? - 20/07/2010 11:55:35 PM 857 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 19/07/2010 04:39:44 PM 813 Views
Everything you said but this... - 20/07/2010 01:25:34 AM 866 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant. - 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM 906 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then.... - 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM 750 Views
I don't really see why this is such a big issue: - 22/07/2010 03:34:46 AM 1028 Views
Because - 22/07/2010 03:50:36 PM 745 Views
What about the True Power? - 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM 884 Views
TP + OR = Boom? - 19/07/2010 06:47:01 AM 822 Views
Re: TP + OR = Boom? or Melt? - 20/07/2010 01:33:20 AM 898 Views
What about Compulsion on herself? - 19/07/2010 09:07:32 PM 831 Views
Interesting idea, I think this might work. *NM* - 20/07/2010 02:33:04 PM 436 Views
Re: What about Compulsion on herself? - 20/07/2010 06:07:53 PM 715 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it. - 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM 892 Views
I actually like this idea. - 20/07/2010 07:40:56 PM 790 Views
I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 07:44:49 PM 966 Views
Re: I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 08:51:15 PM 764 Views
Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM 820 Views
I agree, but... - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM 917 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link - 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM 802 Views
I bet it wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:52:00 PM 1246 Views
this is also possible - 20/07/2010 09:17:36 PM 836 Views
I don't think so - 20/07/2010 09:05:58 PM 806 Views
I don't know - 20/07/2010 09:16:55 PM 826 Views
Re: Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM 1182 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM 808 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM 893 Views
Off-topic question: - 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM 732 Views
What about immortality? - 20/07/2010 08:03:21 PM 743 Views
Depends on how she is immortal. - 21/07/2010 09:09:49 PM 681 Views

Reply to Message