Active Users:630 Time:02/08/2025 10:59:56 PM
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM
No Forsaken took any Oath on the Rod. In fact, any regular Darkfriend never took any Oath. Except Black Ajah of course.

Black Ajah had access to the Rod and they NEED to look ageless, so, thus, the Black Ajah Oaths.


Never claimed that they took oaths on the OR, in fact I agree 100% that they did not considering their attitude towards the AS of this age who voluntarily do. However Messy and all of the forsaken do take oaths to the dark. In fact the difference betwen the Forsaken and the rest of the DFs is that they perform their oaths at SG directly to the DO. We just don"t know how "binding" those oaths are.


But this is irrelevant to the conversation! We are talking about effects the Rod has on the channelers. Not some other type of oaths and some other means to swear them. We are specifically talking about the Oath the Aes Sedai are taking using the Rod.

Since Mesaana never took the Oath on the Rod, we don't know the effect it would have on her to unswear them. My theory is that it has Oath-negative effect and as soon as channeler take the Oath, its nullified by the Oath-negative effect.

The big problem with my theory so far is that in Age of Legends any criminal channeler could've unswore before was administered the punishment and thus escaping it alltogether.

But maybe Dominic is right (in some of his post he mentioned it) and you have to swear-unswear on the same Rod in order to have the effect. We actually don't know what happens to the Aes Sedai that want to unswear the Oaths on the different Rod. We saw that Galina was forced to take different Oaths on different Rod, but it's not the same.
Reply to message
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM 3806 Views
I agree with Deadsy... - 17/07/2010 11:32:09 AM 1054 Views
could be - 17/07/2010 04:39:10 PM 932 Views
I wonder if masking one's ability messes with the OR - 17/07/2010 02:44:37 PM 1016 Views
I don't think - 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM 1285 Views
Re: I don't think - 17/07/2010 07:26:57 PM 987 Views
Re: I don't think - 18/07/2010 06:13:59 PM 976 Views
Another AS does the channeling according to NS - 17/07/2010 10:02:32 PM 1005 Views
And the Shaido "Wise Ones" channeled for Galina. *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:58:49 AM 536 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM 982 Views
That's an interesting theory - 18/07/2010 02:01:23 AM 973 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM 895 Views
Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 02:30:04 PM 812 Views
Re: Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 05:59:07 PM 837 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM 1104 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 865 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM 856 Views
Re: How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 18/07/2010 04:46:23 PM 825 Views
I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM 990 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM 1032 Views
Is the Verin thing widely known? - 19/07/2010 05:51:05 AM 916 Views
Re: Is the Verin thing widely known? - 20/07/2010 11:55:35 PM 891 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 19/07/2010 04:39:44 PM 843 Views
Everything you said but this... - 20/07/2010 01:25:34 AM 899 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant. - 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM 936 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then.... - 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM 785 Views
I don't really see why this is such a big issue: - 22/07/2010 03:34:46 AM 1072 Views
Because - 22/07/2010 03:50:36 PM 778 Views
What about the True Power? - 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM 938 Views
TP + OR = Boom? - 19/07/2010 06:47:01 AM 859 Views
Re: TP + OR = Boom? or Melt? - 20/07/2010 01:33:20 AM 934 Views
What about Compulsion on herself? - 19/07/2010 09:07:32 PM 864 Views
Interesting idea, I think this might work. *NM* - 20/07/2010 02:33:04 PM 451 Views
Re: What about Compulsion on herself? - 20/07/2010 06:07:53 PM 744 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it. - 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM 922 Views
I actually like this idea. - 20/07/2010 07:40:56 PM 827 Views
I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 07:44:49 PM 1000 Views
Re: I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 08:51:15 PM 795 Views
Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM 852 Views
I agree, but... - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM 949 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link - 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM 837 Views
I bet it wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:52:00 PM 1281 Views
this is also possible - 20/07/2010 09:17:36 PM 865 Views
I don't think so - 20/07/2010 09:05:58 PM 852 Views
I don't know - 20/07/2010 09:16:55 PM 860 Views
Re: Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM 1216 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM 842 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM 924 Views
Off-topic question: - 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM 771 Views
What about immortality? - 20/07/2010 08:03:21 PM 772 Views
Depends on how she is immortal. - 21/07/2010 09:09:49 PM 728 Views

Reply to Message