Active Users:1579 Time:01/05/2026 09:29:41 PM
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM
No Forsaken took any Oath on the Rod. In fact, any regular Darkfriend never took any Oath. Except Black Ajah of course.

Black Ajah had access to the Rod and they NEED to look ageless, so, thus, the Black Ajah Oaths.


Never claimed that they took oaths on the OR, in fact I agree 100% that they did not considering their attitude towards the AS of this age who voluntarily do. However Messy and all of the forsaken do take oaths to the dark. In fact the difference betwen the Forsaken and the rest of the DFs is that they perform their oaths at SG directly to the DO. We just don"t know how "binding" those oaths are.


But this is irrelevant to the conversation! We are talking about effects the Rod has on the channelers. Not some other type of oaths and some other means to swear them. We are specifically talking about the Oath the Aes Sedai are taking using the Rod.

Since Mesaana never took the Oath on the Rod, we don't know the effect it would have on her to unswear them. My theory is that it has Oath-negative effect and as soon as channeler take the Oath, its nullified by the Oath-negative effect.

The big problem with my theory so far is that in Age of Legends any criminal channeler could've unswore before was administered the punishment and thus escaping it alltogether.

But maybe Dominic is right (in some of his post he mentioned it) and you have to swear-unswear on the same Rod in order to have the effect. We actually don't know what happens to the Aes Sedai that want to unswear the Oaths on the different Rod. We saw that Galina was forced to take different Oaths on different Rod, but it's not the same.
Reply to message
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM 4055 Views
I agree with Deadsy... - 17/07/2010 11:32:09 AM 1174 Views
could be - 17/07/2010 04:39:10 PM 1040 Views
I wonder if masking one's ability messes with the OR - 17/07/2010 02:44:37 PM 1153 Views
I don't think - 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM 1452 Views
Re: I don't think - 17/07/2010 07:26:57 PM 1104 Views
Re: I don't think - 18/07/2010 06:13:59 PM 1107 Views
Another AS does the channeling according to NS - 17/07/2010 10:02:32 PM 1156 Views
And the Shaido "Wise Ones" channeled for Galina. *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:58:49 AM 606 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM 1118 Views
That's an interesting theory - 18/07/2010 02:01:23 AM 1079 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM 1032 Views
Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 02:30:04 PM 936 Views
Re: Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 05:59:07 PM 963 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM 1239 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 991 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM 975 Views
Re: How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 18/07/2010 04:46:23 PM 940 Views
I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM 1107 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM 1172 Views
Is the Verin thing widely known? - 19/07/2010 05:51:05 AM 1026 Views
Re: Is the Verin thing widely known? - 20/07/2010 11:55:35 PM 1015 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 19/07/2010 04:39:44 PM 955 Views
Everything you said but this... - 20/07/2010 01:25:34 AM 1034 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant. - 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM 1057 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then.... - 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM 901 Views
I don't really see why this is such a big issue: - 22/07/2010 03:34:46 AM 1214 Views
Because - 22/07/2010 03:50:36 PM 906 Views
What about the True Power? - 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM 1067 Views
TP + OR = Boom? - 19/07/2010 06:47:01 AM 991 Views
Re: TP + OR = Boom? or Melt? - 20/07/2010 01:33:20 AM 1049 Views
What about Compulsion on herself? - 19/07/2010 09:07:32 PM 1030 Views
Interesting idea, I think this might work. *NM* - 20/07/2010 02:33:04 PM 511 Views
Re: What about Compulsion on herself? - 20/07/2010 06:07:53 PM 866 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it. - 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM 1063 Views
I actually like this idea. - 20/07/2010 07:40:56 PM 980 Views
I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 07:44:49 PM 1156 Views
Re: I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 08:51:15 PM 913 Views
Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM 975 Views
I agree, but... - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM 1094 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link - 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM 970 Views
I bet it wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:52:00 PM 1419 Views
this is also possible - 20/07/2010 09:17:36 PM 1007 Views
I don't think so - 20/07/2010 09:05:58 PM 1012 Views
I don't know - 20/07/2010 09:16:55 PM 990 Views
Re: Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM 1354 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM 952 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM 1031 Views
Off-topic question: - 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM 892 Views
What about immortality? - 20/07/2010 08:03:21 PM 878 Views
Depends on how she is immortal. - 21/07/2010 09:09:49 PM 878 Views

Reply to Message