Active Users:2555 Time:18/06/2026 02:32:03 PM
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM
No Forsaken took any Oath on the Rod. In fact, any regular Darkfriend never took any Oath. Except Black Ajah of course.

Black Ajah had access to the Rod and they NEED to look ageless, so, thus, the Black Ajah Oaths.


Never claimed that they took oaths on the OR, in fact I agree 100% that they did not considering their attitude towards the AS of this age who voluntarily do. However Messy and all of the forsaken do take oaths to the dark. In fact the difference betwen the Forsaken and the rest of the DFs is that they perform their oaths at SG directly to the DO. We just don"t know how "binding" those oaths are.


But this is irrelevant to the conversation! We are talking about effects the Rod has on the channelers. Not some other type of oaths and some other means to swear them. We are specifically talking about the Oath the Aes Sedai are taking using the Rod.

Since Mesaana never took the Oath on the Rod, we don't know the effect it would have on her to unswear them. My theory is that it has Oath-negative effect and as soon as channeler take the Oath, its nullified by the Oath-negative effect.

The big problem with my theory so far is that in Age of Legends any criminal channeler could've unswore before was administered the punishment and thus escaping it alltogether.

But maybe Dominic is right (in some of his post he mentioned it) and you have to swear-unswear on the same Rod in order to have the effect. We actually don't know what happens to the Aes Sedai that want to unswear the Oaths on the different Rod. We saw that Galina was forced to take different Oaths on different Rod, but it's not the same.
Reply to message
How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 17/07/2010 10:26:42 AM 4100 Views
I agree with Deadsy... - 17/07/2010 11:32:09 AM 1200 Views
could be - 17/07/2010 04:39:10 PM 1065 Views
I wonder if masking one's ability messes with the OR - 17/07/2010 02:44:37 PM 1178 Views
I don't think - 17/07/2010 05:29:59 PM 1476 Views
Re: I don't think - 17/07/2010 07:26:57 PM 1125 Views
Re: I don't think - 18/07/2010 06:13:59 PM 1131 Views
Another AS does the channeling according to NS - 17/07/2010 10:02:32 PM 1181 Views
And the Shaido "Wise Ones" channeled for Galina. *NM* - 18/07/2010 01:58:49 AM 616 Views
As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 17/07/2010 06:42:38 PM 1142 Views
That's an interesting theory - 18/07/2010 02:01:23 AM 1105 Views
Re: As mentioned above, your theory is not about defeating Oath Rod. - 20/07/2010 02:02:05 PM 1056 Views
Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 02:30:04 PM 957 Views
Re: Good point. We're asking the wrong questions entirely. - 20/07/2010 05:59:07 PM 990 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 04:04:28 PM 1270 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 06:02:40 PM 1016 Views
Re: "Mesanna did have oathes, just not the 3 AS ones". No she didn't - 20/07/2010 07:26:20 PM 998 Views
Re: How did Mesaana beat the Oath Rod? - 18/07/2010 04:46:23 PM 964 Views
I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 05:50:50 PM 1131 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 18/07/2010 07:28:51 PM 1196 Views
Is the Verin thing widely known? - 19/07/2010 05:51:05 AM 1052 Views
Re: Is the Verin thing widely known? - 20/07/2010 11:55:35 PM 1037 Views
Re: I think this is a tricky issue - 19/07/2010 04:39:44 PM 983 Views
Everything you said but this... - 20/07/2010 01:25:34 AM 1066 Views
Or she didn't swear on it, because she's a servant. - 18/07/2010 11:05:08 PM 1082 Views
but BS would not have told us to think about defeating the oath rod then.... - 19/07/2010 04:10:56 PM 935 Views
I don't really see why this is such a big issue: - 22/07/2010 03:34:46 AM 1236 Views
Because - 22/07/2010 03:50:36 PM 951 Views
What about the True Power? - 19/07/2010 06:30:57 AM 1096 Views
TP + OR = Boom? - 19/07/2010 06:47:01 AM 1014 Views
Re: TP + OR = Boom? or Melt? - 20/07/2010 01:33:20 AM 1070 Views
What about Compulsion on herself? - 19/07/2010 09:07:32 PM 1067 Views
Interesting idea, I think this might work. *NM* - 20/07/2010 02:33:04 PM 519 Views
Re: What about Compulsion on herself? - 20/07/2010 06:07:53 PM 890 Views
Yeah I realize what I presented was kinda the opposite of what I was going for. - 20/07/2010 02:15:46 AM 1012 Views
I just thought of the most obvious way around it. - 20/07/2010 06:17:34 PM 1089 Views
I actually like this idea. - 20/07/2010 07:40:56 PM 1008 Views
I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 07:44:49 PM 1180 Views
Re: I think this won't work for one reason. - 20/07/2010 08:51:15 PM 933 Views
Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:03:52 PM 995 Views
I agree, but... - 20/07/2010 08:20:33 PM 1116 Views
This makes me wonder what would happen to a woman in a Link - 20/07/2010 08:37:12 PM 995 Views
I bet it wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 08:52:00 PM 1441 Views
this is also possible - 20/07/2010 09:17:36 PM 1027 Views
I don't think so - 20/07/2010 09:05:58 PM 1034 Views
I don't know - 20/07/2010 09:16:55 PM 1012 Views
Re: Wouldn't work - 20/07/2010 09:11:50 PM 1378 Views
I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:22:51 PM 974 Views
Re: I think the OR is tied to a channelers connection to the OP and nothing else - 20/07/2010 09:44:12 PM 1054 Views
Off-topic question: - 21/07/2010 09:07:12 PM 916 Views
What about immortality? - 20/07/2010 08:03:21 PM 906 Views
Depends on how she is immortal. - 21/07/2010 09:09:49 PM 900 Views

Reply to Message