Active Users:646 Time:04/08/2025 03:45:29 PM
Maybe we're just reading it wrong Sidious Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM
It could be Lews Therin's sword from the War of Power which was unearthed directly, or found in a stasis box.

1. If it's Power wrought it could have survived 3,000 years. Centuries don't preclude it from being millenia old... it's merely 30 centuries old.

2. He's surprised that it's from his own memories because the theme of the chapter is that the two men are merging mentally. Later he shouts directly at Lews Therin, which is also a first. Instead of it being read as a memory of Rand's, it might be his surprise that Lews Therin said nothing and that he recognized it. In essence, they're becoming one man.

It can't plausibly be a False Dragon's. Amalasan is no more a valid memory to Rand than it is to Lews Therin. Rand is 21 years old and he doesn't have Mat's memories. He's got his life experiences and Lews Therin's. It must logically be Lews Therin's that he's referring to, but he's just surprised that Lews Therin isn't the one mentioning it.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
This message last edited by Sidious on 09/09/2009 at 05:06:53 AM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1305 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 776 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 826 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 719 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 719 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 790 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 762 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 722 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 696 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 756 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 903 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 724 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 712 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 665 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 738 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 664 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 624 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 709 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 854 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 789 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 711 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 711 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 723 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 682 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 656 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1171 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 747 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 702 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 659 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 693 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 659 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 760 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 741 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 701 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 677 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 676 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 648 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 729 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 777 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 767 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 691 Views

Reply to Message