Active Users:406 Time:17/06/2025 01:08:22 AM
Maybe we're just reading it wrong Sidious Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM
It could be Lews Therin's sword from the War of Power which was unearthed directly, or found in a stasis box.

1. If it's Power wrought it could have survived 3,000 years. Centuries don't preclude it from being millenia old... it's merely 30 centuries old.

2. He's surprised that it's from his own memories because the theme of the chapter is that the two men are merging mentally. Later he shouts directly at Lews Therin, which is also a first. Instead of it being read as a memory of Rand's, it might be his surprise that Lews Therin said nothing and that he recognized it. In essence, they're becoming one man.

It can't plausibly be a False Dragon's. Amalasan is no more a valid memory to Rand than it is to Lews Therin. Rand is 21 years old and he doesn't have Mat's memories. He's got his life experiences and Lews Therin's. It must logically be Lews Therin's that he's referring to, but he's just surprised that Lews Therin isn't the one mentioning it.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
This message last edited by Sidious on 09/09/2009 at 05:06:53 AM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1287 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 761 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 810 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 707 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 702 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 763 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 747 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 705 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 677 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 740 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 864 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 708 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 682 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 646 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 716 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 645 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 607 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 695 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 835 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 773 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 695 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 690 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 704 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 657 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 638 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1151 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 719 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 679 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 630 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 680 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 641 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 746 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 718 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 688 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 663 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 667 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 632 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 707 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 759 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 744 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 676 Views

Reply to Message