Re: BS said "there will be consequences from Rand's True Power use."
Datakim Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 04:18:34 AM
A distinct possible consequence, now that Rand has destroyed the CK, is that the amount of saidin he could get from the CK helped him keep the desire to use the TP again at bay. Now, if Rand finds himself in a dark spot or a position of weakness, he might struggle a lot more resisting the temptation to embrace the TP (which gave him a feeling of utter power similar to a far greater amount of saiding that Rand can embrace unaided... the sort of feeling he could reproduce by drawing on the CK and now could only be embracing the TP). Demandred (or Moghedien) experienced something similar - they used the TP only when it was their last chance/last hope (it's not totally unlike how Nynaeve broke her block, except in her despair/darkness she gave up, and this surrender was what she needed. Previously, she could embrace saidar only when she was so blinded by anger she forgot she was surrendering to saidar).
I suspect that BS has already answered that question

Q: You mention that Shaidar Haran has quite a few limitations on his power. Can you give us a few concrete examples of these limitations?
A: Shaidar Haran needs a minion to do most of his work for him. Elza was essential to Shaidar Haran in getting things done.
This lead to lots of discussion about swearing to the Shadow – basically, it’s a very bad idea and you forfeit some very basic protections when you do. Shaidar Haran has special power over those that swear to the Dark One, and the Forsaken in particular. I asked about Alviarin’s special mark, and he said Shaidar Haran has similar power over her. The implication is that there are lots of ramifications for swearing to the Dark One. Brandon mentioned that this makes Verin all the more remarkable.
If simply swearing to the DO loses you these "basic protections", then what would actually channeling the very essence of the DO do?
I think by using TP, Rand has lost all of these inherent protections and is now vulnerable to the shadow, including the ability of SH to completely block him from the OP.
foreshadowing of Semirhage's death
- 25/07/2010 07:13:48 AM
1745 Views
I don't think that Semirhage was sacrificed
- 25/07/2010 08:36:47 AM
945 Views
I disagree about the TP aspect
- 25/07/2010 03:30:37 PM
867 Views
Re: I disagree about the TP aspect
- 25/07/2010 04:03:45 PM
858 Views
It's an interesting theory in either direction
- 25/07/2010 04:54:31 PM
799 Views
Re: It's an interesting theory in either direction
- 26/07/2010 02:17:35 AM
642 Views
BS said "there will be consequences from Rand's True Power use."
- 26/07/2010 09:24:26 AM
673 Views
Re: BS said "there will be consequences from Rand's True Power use."
- 27/07/2010 03:48:32 AM
714 Views
Re: BS said "there will be consequences from Rand's True Power use."
- 27/07/2010 04:18:34 AM
698 Views
Re: I disagree about the TP aspect
- 26/07/2010 01:22:30 AM
688 Views
I don't know if Semirhage was sacrificed or not. Either way the Semirhage quote set up tGS 6 books
- 26/07/2010 02:29:59 AM
751 Views
You were right the first time
- 26/07/2010 03:02:22 AM
790 Views
I think the question is...
- 26/07/2010 08:27:17 AM
703 Views
Re: I think the question is...
- 27/07/2010 12:43:44 AM
709 Views
Re: I think the question is...
- 27/07/2010 01:15:29 AM
719 Views
Re: I think the question is...
- 27/07/2010 02:10:41 AM
677 Views
Re: I think the question is...
- 27/07/2010 03:17:01 AM
753 Views
I'd say that there was a pre-meditated plan or backup plan to sacrifice Semirhage
- 26/07/2010 09:02:44 AM
759 Views
I think SH simply didn't care about the CK access key
- 26/07/2010 09:17:11 AM
676 Views
Moridin and SH knew that the CK could never defeat the dark one so they were happy to leave it
- 26/07/2010 05:56:56 PM
768 Views
Unlikely, and stupid if true
- 26/07/2010 06:12:30 PM
673 Views
That wasn't the Choedan Kal, that was Shadar Logoth.
- 27/07/2010 12:11:46 AM
626 Views
Re: That wasn't the Choedan Kal, that was Shadar Logoth.
- 27/07/2010 01:29:29 AM
645 Views
I fail to see the relevance. *NM*
- 27/07/2010 02:06:27 AM
292 Views
the relevance is that it was impossible without the CK
- 27/07/2010 05:25:45 AM
600 Views
Are you certain?
- 27/07/2010 05:37:28 AM
645 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true
- 27/07/2010 01:36:53 AM
614 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true
- 27/07/2010 02:19:22 AM
656 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true
- 27/07/2010 02:43:39 AM
667 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true
- 27/07/2010 03:17:49 AM
703 Views
Re: Unlikely, and stupid if true
- 27/07/2010 01:44:19 AM
716 Views
??? The CK in the hands of a madman is exactly what the Dark One needs to destroy the pattern
- 27/07/2010 07:01:13 AM
665 Views
So why not give it to Moridin then?
- 27/07/2010 10:54:47 AM
684 Views
If their plan of taking Rand to Shayol Ghul suceeded then the CK was no longer needed
- 27/07/2010 03:39:58 PM
663 Views
Could be simple. How do you find an object that "lies hidden"?
- 27/07/2010 04:17:35 PM
645 Views
It could be, but I would still think they would have noticed the CK sitting next to the male a'dam
- 27/07/2010 04:34:45 PM
635 Views
This has been seen and commented before, by myself and others.
- 26/07/2010 03:36:51 PM
630 Views
Sorry I missed them. I would have been happy enough to comment there.
- 27/07/2010 03:43:46 AM
675 Views
Hands up if you don't believe in foreshadowing in this series
- 26/07/2010 04:27:14 PM
692 Views
Re: Hands up if you don't believe in foreshadowing in this series
- 26/07/2010 10:34:18 PM
614 Views
You confuse foreshadowing and predictability
- 27/07/2010 02:57:15 AM
980 Views
That last line had me laughing! (right on the money too, by the way) *NM*
- 27/07/2010 02:58:20 PM
279 Views
I don't believe in foreshadowing that you can figure out from the actual plot.
- 27/07/2010 08:42:11 PM
646 Views
