Active Users:678 Time:22/03/2026 05:34:58 PM
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
I agree that it is from the age of legends because Rand reflects on it's age, and no sword with cloth wrappings on the hilt could survive that long unless it was created with the power.

He ?ngered the cloth-tied hilt

It looked as if it had been designed speci?cally for Rand—and yet it was centuries old, unearthed only recently. 


If it is not Justice than it is at least a ter/an/sa'angreal of some sort. Other wise Rand wouldn't think:

How odd, that they should ?nd this now, he thought, and make a gift of it to me, completely unaware of what they were holding. . . .


Of course, no real sword that wasn't fored by the power or very carefuly maintained and stored could survive a thousand years, on the other hand, it's a fictional sword in a book and even the ebst author tends to overlooks the occassional detail, so I suppose we shouldn't take it for granted that if it is Justice it is also an OP-forged weapon, but odds are it is Justice and it is OP-forged. They probably tell us in the prologue, so w emay all be laughing at our wild-arse theories in a few days here :D
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1475 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 944 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 967 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 878 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 901 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 959 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 917 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 869 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 836 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 936 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 1092 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 882 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 883 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 810 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 892 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 819 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 789 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 865 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 1037 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 939 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 879 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 862 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 883 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 857 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 831 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM 849 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1374 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 910 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 857 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 840 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 858 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 794 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 905 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 926 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 868 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 810 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 807 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 789 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 895 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 950 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 911 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 845 Views

Reply to Message