Active Users:648 Time:04/08/2025 03:41:34 PM
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
I agree that it is from the age of legends because Rand reflects on it's age, and no sword with cloth wrappings on the hilt could survive that long unless it was created with the power.

He ?ngered the cloth-tied hilt

It looked as if it had been designed speci?cally for Rand—and yet it was centuries old, unearthed only recently. 


If it is not Justice than it is at least a ter/an/sa'angreal of some sort. Other wise Rand wouldn't think:

How odd, that they should ?nd this now, he thought, and make a gift of it to me, completely unaware of what they were holding. . . .


Of course, no real sword that wasn't fored by the power or very carefuly maintained and stored could survive a thousand years, on the other hand, it's a fictional sword in a book and even the ebst author tends to overlooks the occassional detail, so I suppose we shouldn't take it for granted that if it is Justice it is also an OP-forged weapon, but odds are it is Justice and it is OP-forged. They probably tell us in the prologue, so w emay all be laughing at our wild-arse theories in a few days here :D
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1305 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 776 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 826 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 719 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 719 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 790 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 762 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 722 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 696 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 756 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 903 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 724 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 712 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 665 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 738 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 664 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 624 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 709 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 853 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 789 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 711 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 711 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 723 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 682 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 656 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue - 09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM 679 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1171 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 747 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 701 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 659 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 692 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 659 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 760 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 740 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 701 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 677 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 676 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 648 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 728 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 776 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 767 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 691 Views

Reply to Message