The oath against using the OP as a weapon should have prevented Elaida or any captive Aes Sedai from showing the Seanchan Travelling.
Elaida KNEW what they would do with Travelling, that they would use it to KILL and there is NO WAY they could have possibly made her believe they were going to use it for benign purposes.
Elaida KNEW what they would do with Travelling, that they would use it to KILL and there is NO WAY they could have possibly made her believe they were going to use it for benign purposes.
And I'm a little surprised Egwene hasn't done something like this in the Tower. All Elaida had to do was, at some point early in her captivity when she understood she wasn't going to escape, that she was going to be broken, to swear an oath to herself not to reveal Travelling (or any other Aes Sedai weave) to her captors.
She's not Black Ajah so the first oath would have made it binding. Even if she was broken and turned into a happy, obedient damane, she couldn't have revealed it.
Even better, she should have opened the gateway and then started yanking threads out of it. With any luck there would have been another Gateway!bomb that would have vaporised every Seanchan within two hundred paces
Elaida, oh no you didn't!
- 04/12/2010 06:38:22 AM
2125 Views
The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 06:54:20 AM
1035 Views
Re: The weave will not directly result in death
- 04/12/2010 07:08:50 AM
938 Views
Wrong for two reasons
- 04/12/2010 09:10:03 AM
1101 Views
Re: Wrong for two reasons
- 05/12/2010 08:39:02 AM
845 Views
you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:01:27 AM
730 Views
Re: you're forgetting she was collared.
- 05/12/2010 09:08:30 AM
821 Views
uhm, no that's not all you're saying.
- 05/12/2010 09:14:47 AM
832 Views
Yeah I am
- 05/12/2010 09:17:48 AM
760 Views
no. dude i gave you a direct quote from your own statement. that is not what you said
- 05/12/2010 09:20:14 AM
888 Views
Go dude yourself brother.
- 05/12/2010 09:27:33 AM
749 Views
wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:33:41 AM
841 Views
Re: wow i just...wow.
- 05/12/2010 09:45:47 AM
831 Views
yes well you genuinely seem to be having a problem comprehending your own statements.
- 05/12/2010 09:51:18 AM
693 Views
Well you genuinely seem to be retarded.
- 05/12/2010 09:59:19 AM
760 Views
I judge this based off your own reactions to other's statements
- 05/12/2010 10:05:58 AM
860 Views
I judge you based on your own statements towards me
- 05/12/2010 10:16:18 AM
785 Views
if all you did was disagree with me, we would not be having this discussion.
- 05/12/2010 10:25:36 AM
731 Views
Seconded "This"^ *NM*
- 04/12/2010 07:09:17 PM
367 Views
the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 04/12/2010 02:55:13 PM
771 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 05/12/2010 08:43:48 AM
824 Views
just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:07:08 AM
777 Views
Re: just because they didn't want to doesn't mean they weren't able.
- 05/12/2010 09:11:28 AM
802 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:42 AM
363 Views
well that would explain how santa is able to make his rounds in one night! *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:43 AM
309 Views
Re: the oath is very literal and does not forbid indirectly causing death
- 06/12/2010 03:44:33 PM
742 Views
This is ridiculous. You can teach any weave, including Balefire. You just can't always use it. *NM*
- 05/12/2010 06:37:16 AM
323 Views
You can teach a weave so long as YOU believe that the weave won't be a weapon. Elaida knows better *NM*
- 05/12/2010 09:13:57 AM
366 Views
This is false, we've seen battle weaves taught since the start of the series.
- 05/12/2010 01:49:13 PM
720 Views
Right? and every AS seems to know how to make a fireball and call lightning
- 05/12/2010 02:44:45 PM
721 Views
There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 11:37:09 AM
721 Views
Re: There's another way she could have avoided it
- 05/12/2010 01:51:06 PM
1091 Views

*NM*
*NM*