Active Users:647 Time:18/12/2025 02:18:04 PM
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" rAndy aL Send a noteboard - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM
The problem is that the place for this ambush was no pre-planned
Um, yes it was.

They had not known where—or if—the gholam would attack him, but Guybon had done his job well, getting everyone out of the nearby buildings, then picking a hallway that the Kinswoman would make the gateway into. He'd sent a member of the Band to tell Talmanes where to go.


Er... That means that Guybon had been tracking Mat and quickly picked and prepared a place for the gateway while the attack was happening. That is not enough time to learn a place for a gateway (even holding the power). This is what I meant when I said it was not pre-planned. I mean, it's not like Guybon could have prepared an ambush in every street of the entire city, instead he managed to do it right next to where the gholam attacked.
This message last edited by rAndy aL on 25/12/2010 at 12:30:08 AM
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2367 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1483 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1301 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1318 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 573 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 572 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1203 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 1026 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1213 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 537 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1214 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 1158 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 1183 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1206 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 1137 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1155 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 1036 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 1110 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 1120 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 1060 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 1146 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 1003 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1263 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 1086 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 1161 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 1135 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 1006 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 1049 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1284 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 1138 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 1005 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 652 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1221 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 972 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 973 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 522 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1185 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 1158 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 1060 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 1097 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 1043 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 1119 Views

Reply to Message