Active Users:409 Time:17/06/2025 02:34:56 AM
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" rAndy aL Send a noteboard - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM
The problem is that the place for this ambush was no pre-planned
Um, yes it was.

They had not known where—or if—the gholam would attack him, but Guybon had done his job well, getting everyone out of the nearby buildings, then picking a hallway that the Kinswoman would make the gateway into. He'd sent a member of the Band to tell Talmanes where to go.


Er... That means that Guybon had been tracking Mat and quickly picked and prepared a place for the gateway while the attack was happening. That is not enough time to learn a place for a gateway (even holding the power). This is what I meant when I said it was not pre-planned. I mean, it's not like Guybon could have prepared an ambush in every street of the entire city, instead he managed to do it right next to where the gholam attacked.
This message last edited by rAndy aL on 25/12/2010 at 12:30:08 AM
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2218 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1366 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1187 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1167 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 509 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 510 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1069 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 882 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1095 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 475 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1102 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 998 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 1043 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1056 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 1020 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1027 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 855 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 930 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 1010 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 919 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 997 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 856 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1141 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 916 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 1007 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 948 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 865 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 925 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1117 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 982 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 883 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 592 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1080 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 849 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 859 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 455 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1028 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 1010 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 932 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 935 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 945 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 968 Views

Reply to Message