Active Users:334 Time:27/04/2024 06:01:37 PM
Mostly, yes. redqueen Send a noteboard - 23/01/2011 05:57:17 PM
Would this not be a good thing? Seeing how they run the lands they already posses, and how good of shape they are in, reletive to the rest of randland, wouldn't most of the country be better off with governing body that already knows how to take care of the disonance and destruction that is prophecised after TG?


As civilisations go, the Seanchan one isn't the worst one to live in, as long as you aren't a channeler with the spark (0.01% of the population), and you don't challenge the heirarchy. There's equality under the law (the Blood have privileges, yes, but it's a modern western belief that one law applies to everyone. Seanchan has different laws for nobles, commoners and slaves. That doesn't mean they're not equally applied.)

Their status as an aggressively expansionist empire means their citizens can expect a general increase in prosperity in the short-to-medium term. However, like all empires, it will eventually overextend itself or stagnate, and start to crumble. Its bureaucracy will ossify, wars will become increasinly expensive, etc, and the empire will start to break up again. Actually,this could be the 'breaking' of the Fourth age, if the Seanchan do take over Randland.

However for the immediate post-TG future, the Seanchan would indeed provide stability. Whether 'stability' is actually desirable is another thing - the Breaking seems to be a necessary part of the turning of the wheel, and the chaos is leaves does eventually settle into a new, superior order, compared to the corrupt or archaic nations and power structures which preceded it.
Reply to message
Seanchan Takeover of Randland - 22/01/2011 11:25:36 PM 1977 Views
You mean utter anarchy and a dangerously stratified society? - 23/01/2011 07:24:48 AM 745 Views
The situation in Seanchan isn't that unique - 23/01/2011 07:49:28 AM 761 Views
Except with continous rebellion. - 23/01/2011 12:13:17 PM 734 Views
That's to be expected. - 23/01/2011 12:56:07 PM 733 Views
They treat channelers like DOGS! so, No. *NM* - 23/01/2011 07:56:22 AM 384 Views
I treat my dog better *NM* - 23/01/2011 10:28:08 AM 369 Views
Good point. *NM* - 24/01/2011 01:47:29 AM 394 Views
The Pattern certainly has some plan or purpose for the Seanchan. - 23/01/2011 10:59:33 AM 817 Views
That's what's scary. In many ways, the Seanchan embody the goals of the Pattern - 23/01/2011 11:41:35 PM 676 Views
I think it's interesting - 24/01/2011 09:23:40 AM 687 Views
There has been ta'veren since Hawkwing and before the Triple. - 28/01/2011 11:56:46 AM 682 Views
Who were they? - 29/01/2011 12:33:58 AM 630 Views
Um, no - 23/01/2011 11:36:24 AM 758 Views
look around you again - 23/01/2011 03:24:01 PM 712 Views
Re: look around you again - 23/01/2011 03:54:49 PM 725 Views
Seanchan equality before the law - 23/01/2011 04:09:54 PM 761 Views
Re: Seanchan equality before the law - 23/01/2011 04:22:28 PM 723 Views
a) most of that is your own extrapolation, not shown in the text - 23/01/2011 04:56:14 PM 716 Views
Yes. - 23/01/2011 04:47:30 PM 696 Views
Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 05:57:17 PM 694 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 686 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 06:33:00 PM 717 Views
Re: Mostly, yes. - 23/01/2011 11:03:36 PM 668 Views
Not really - 23/01/2011 07:12:27 PM 681 Views
I disagree. - 25/01/2011 07:17:18 PM 680 Views
I see them as neccessary evil to eventually eliminate channeling. - 24/01/2011 08:04:21 PM 777 Views
Lack of knowledge doesn't mean the One Power vanishes or is destroyed. - 26/01/2011 04:03:22 PM 604 Views
If OP still existed, you'd still have sparkers even "today". *NM* - 26/01/2011 06:34:50 PM 357 Views
Not exactly; genetics are more complicated. - 27/01/2011 09:48:48 PM 655 Views
No - 25/01/2011 05:41:09 PM 762 Views
Ah, um, no. - 29/01/2011 11:53:16 PM 673 Views
The thing is - 04/02/2011 05:29:15 AM 633 Views
They didn't break anything - 04/02/2011 02:13:10 PM 675 Views
Contemplate this then.... - 04/02/2011 10:29:09 PM 698 Views
Re: Contemplate this then.... - 06/02/2011 12:44:21 AM 671 Views

Reply to Message