He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM
So since the prophecy says that Rand will destroy the Aiel, except for the remnant of the remnant who will live, and you claim that said destruction comes from what we have seen in AViendha's vision, we come to the conclusion that:
1- You think it is fair to blame Rand for actions that were taken by others after his death that will lead to the extinction of the Aiel in thousands of years.
2- You believe that Aviendha's vision is unavoidable.
While I do not agree with either of these and maintain that the vision is therefore flawed, if you accept them, then you can indeed reconcile it with the Prophecies.
1- You think it is fair to blame Rand for actions that were taken by others after his death that will lead to the extinction of the Aiel in thousands of years.
2- You believe that Aviendha's vision is unavoidable.
While I do not agree with either of these and maintain that the vision is therefore flawed, if you accept them, then you can indeed reconcile it with the Prophecies.
But what you clearly believe is that Rand must personally kill the Aiel. So Aviendha's vision is moot since Ramd will have slaughtered millions of Aiel all on his own.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan
- 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM
2115 Views
The entire point, I believe, is to give Avienda the opportunity to change that future
- 03/04/2012 05:13:48 PM
1479 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM
1131 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel
- 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM
1086 Views
There are more than there were before.
- 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM
1084 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers
- 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM
1016 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM
1099 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM
1335 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM
1157 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM
1399 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM
997 Views
Re: Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 06/04/2012 12:20:31 AM
1162 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM
1323 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM
1018 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM
947 Views
So what you're saying...
- 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM
887 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel
- 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM
993 Views
I never said it was.
- 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM
1089 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been
- 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM
1027 Views
No...
- 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM
1121 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM
1112 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM
1122 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM
900 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could
- 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM
1029 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake.
- 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM
902 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM
1059 Views
No. They are not.
- 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM
931 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
935 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible.
- 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
1120 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel
- 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM
895 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant.
- 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM
915 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM
964 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM
980 Views
That is what I just said
- 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM
935 Views
What is important about that?
- 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM
912 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
- 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
1076 Views
So what you're saying is...
- 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM
974 Views
That's exactly it
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1032 Views
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1032 Views
Good.
- 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM
1055 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it
- 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM
899 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever.
- 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM
997 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM
943 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM
1139 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was...
- 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM
913 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years?
- 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM
868 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM
1134 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM
1031 Views
