Active Users:555 Time:15/09/2026 10:44:01 AM
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM
Because Rand will save existence itself from Shai'tan, anything and everything that happens does so only because Rand allowed it to be preventing the total annihilation of everything.


You cannot take it so literally as the actions of only one person that matter. Rand has set in motion dozens of courses of action that probably end with a Prophesy fulfilled, characters have spoken about how the Prophesies are so cryptic he could have fulfilled dozens without them even knowing it. If Rand does not save existence then by default nothing else can happen.

And YES by saving existence itself Rand is indirectly responsible for anything that happens after. Clearly we see potential for people to make their own choices, but without Rand those choices are not possible and thus trace back to Rand. This does not mean Rand must do these deeds himself in order for Prophesy to be fulfilled, his mere existence enables the Prophesies to unfold.

His personal actions are almost incidental to the fulfillment of macro-level Prophesy such as the death of almost an entire race of people, unless you believe he will personally kill all but a remnant of the Aiel. His choices (i.e. saving those who,will accept the Peace of the Dragon) set Prophesy in motion... Thus twenty years after his death/dissapearance the Aiel who did not follow his Peace choose to wage an unwinnable war and end up dying out. They no longer have a purpose in the Pattern and are thus cut from it. Could as easily be some kind of plague or they could in fact die during TG. There are many options for the vast majority of the Aiel to die... Aviendha's vision is simply one of those options. An unlikely one as it clearly shows the Aiel in flagrant disregard to their own Prophesy, something they do not seem likely to do.

Think of how the Mirror Worlds work, they split off into infinite options based on an individual's choices/actions in life. Would Nynaeve of the main world be responsible for the actions created by the Nynaeve of a Mirror World? Or the actions of a Nynaeve of a Mirror World several times removed from the real world?
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 2289 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 1298 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 1260 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 1244 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 1190 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 1277 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 1547 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 627 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 1344 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1700 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 1232 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 1225 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 1167 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 1308 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1519 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 1211 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 1121 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 1045 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 1171 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 1299 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 1205 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 1315 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 1294 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 1306 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 1099 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 969 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 1197 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 1092 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 1239 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 1116 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 1117 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 1309 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 1051 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 1105 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 1156 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 1152 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 1124 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 1078 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 1250 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 1148 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 1209 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 1220 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 1107 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 1158 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 1129 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 1329 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 1042 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 1083 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 1018 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 1200 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 977 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 1268 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 1328 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 1209 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 596 Views

Reply to Message