... that if people die thousands of years after Rand's time, because of decisions made by people who lived long after his death, it's Rand's fault? Do you think the remnant of a remnant will live eternally then?
Honestly. Descendants happen when your people survive.
I'm referring to the possibility that the Remnant are a deliberately chosen group of people (as in SAVED). What happens to those who do not choose to follow the Dragon's Peace looks to be extinction. Their death is not the fault of the Dragon. It looks to be the fault of their choice to continue to deny their heritage as followers of The Way. Just as these people die in war the remnant and their descendants will live and thrive assuming they accept the Peace and stand aside from the war. This is not a difficult concept to understand.
But just in case, let's recap. Prophesy says the Aiel will be broken and destroyed EXCEPT for the remnant Rand will save. Aviendha's vision showed a large group of Aiel dying out due to fighting a war they could not win. This does not go against the Prophesy, as long as there are a remnant of the Aiel who do not participate in the war. If that remnant was saved by Rand (presumably because the chose to go back to The Way) then we have a viable reason Aviendha's vision is not false.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan
- 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM
2327 Views
The entire point, I believe, is to give Avienda the opportunity to change that future
- 03/04/2012 05:13:48 PM
1697 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM
1332 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel
- 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM
1293 Views
There are more than there were before.
- 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM
1277 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers
- 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM
1224 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM
1308 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM
1579 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM
1392 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM
1734 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM
1197 Views
Re: Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 06/04/2012 12:20:31 AM
1405 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM
1551 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM
1245 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM
1149 Views
So what you're saying...
- 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM
1082 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel
- 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM
1207 Views
I never said it was.
- 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM
1340 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been
- 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM
1258 Views
No...
- 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM
1365 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM
1336 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM
1345 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM
1144 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could
- 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM
1237 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake.
- 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM
1131 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM
1292 Views
No. They are not.
- 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM
1148 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
1157 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible.
- 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
1348 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel
- 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM
1083 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant.
- 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM
1146 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM
1198 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM
1190 Views
That is what I just said
- 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM
1152 Views
What is important about that?
- 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM
1116 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
- 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
1282 Views
So what you're saying is...
- 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM
1178 Views
That's exactly it 
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1240 Views
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1240 Views
Good.
- 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM
1249 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it
- 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM
1149 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever.
- 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM
1189 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM
1172 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM
1376 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was...
- 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM
1133 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years?
- 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM
1048 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM
1372 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM
1234 Views