... that if people die thousands of years after Rand's time, because of decisions made by people who lived long after his death, it's Rand's fault? Do you think the remnant of a remnant will live eternally then?
Honestly. Descendants happen when your people survive.
I'm referring to the possibility that the Remnant are a deliberately chosen group of people (as in SAVED). What happens to those who do not choose to follow the Dragon's Peace looks to be extinction. Their death is not the fault of the Dragon. It looks to be the fault of their choice to continue to deny their heritage as followers of The Way. Just as these people die in war the remnant and their descendants will live and thrive assuming they accept the Peace and stand aside from the war. This is not a difficult concept to understand.
But just in case, let's recap. Prophesy says the Aiel will be broken and destroyed EXCEPT for the remnant Rand will save. Aviendha's vision showed a large group of Aiel dying out due to fighting a war they could not win. This does not go against the Prophesy, as long as there are a remnant of the Aiel who do not participate in the war. If that remnant was saved by Rand (presumably because the chose to go back to The Way) then we have a viable reason Aviendha's vision is not false.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan
- 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM
2279 Views
The entire point, I believe, is to give Avienda the opportunity to change that future
- 03/04/2012 05:13:48 PM
1654 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM
1291 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel
- 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM
1248 Views
There are more than there were before.
- 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM
1235 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers
- 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM
1182 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM
1266 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM
1532 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM
1335 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM
1691 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM
1154 Views
Re: Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 06/04/2012 12:20:31 AM
1360 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM
1506 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM
1204 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM
1109 Views
So what you're saying...
- 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM
1035 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel
- 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM
1161 Views
I never said it was.
- 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM
1286 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been
- 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM
1197 Views
No...
- 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM
1306 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM
1288 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM
1299 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM
1090 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could
- 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM
1188 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake.
- 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM
1083 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM
1227 Views
No. They are not.
- 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM
1106 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
1108 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible.
- 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
1299 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel
- 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM
1043 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant.
- 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM
1093 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM
1138 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM
1143 Views
That is what I just said
- 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM
1114 Views
What is important about that?
- 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM
1069 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
- 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
1238 Views
So what you're saying is...
- 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM
1137 Views
That's exactly it 
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1198 Views
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1198 Views
Good.
- 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM
1212 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it
- 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM
1097 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever.
- 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM
1151 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM
1117 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM
1320 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was...
- 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM
1077 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years?
- 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM
1008 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM
1321 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM
1199 Views