If you choose to define "the Aiel" in a way other than the accepted use of the term as referring to the tribal people from the Aiel Waste who share a similar culture and history, then you may attempt to do so, but it needs to be able to fulfill those two end results. For example, it must be a group of people preexisting at the time of Rand's actions as the Dragon Reborn, elsewise there is no remnant to save nor any portion to destroy, as it is impossible to divide by zero, nor to save people who don't exist, nor to destroy people who don't exist.
So for the sake of clarity, please answer these two questions:
1: Do you agree that the Rhuidean Prophecy states that He Who Comes With The Dawn will destroy "the Aiel" except for a remnant of a remnant whom he shall save?
Yes this is what was stated...
2: How do you define "the Aiel"?
The Aiel followed the way of the leaf, as the tinkers. But, they were charged with the task by the Aes Sedai to guard the Angreal, sa'angreal and the ter'angreal until the Aes Sedai could come for them. The only thing the tinkers did wrong was to abandon the angreal, sa'angreal and the ter'angreal. That was the task they were set to do, not what defined them. The Tuatha'an ARE Aiel. They just failed the Aes Sedai differently than the other Aiel. The Jenn were the only ones left that were "True Dedicated"
Rand broke the Aiel by announcing the truth of who they had been and what they had become.
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan
- 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM
2141 Views
The entire point, I believe, is to give Avienda the opportunity to change that future
- 03/04/2012 05:13:48 PM
1511 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM
1153 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel
- 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM
1115 Views
There are more than there were before.
- 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM
1119 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers
- 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM
1043 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM
1133 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM
1373 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM
1184 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM
1468 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM
1024 Views
Re: Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 06/04/2012 12:20:31 AM
1192 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM
1350 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM
1052 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM
971 Views
So what you're saying...
- 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM
913 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel
- 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM
1016 Views
I never said it was.
- 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM
1117 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been
- 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM
1057 Views
No...
- 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM
1151 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM
1140 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM
1148 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM
934 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could
- 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM
1048 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake.
- 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM
929 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM
1082 Views
No. They are not.
- 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM
956 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
963 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible.
- 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
1145 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel
- 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM
919 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant.
- 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM
937 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM
998 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM
1010 Views
That is what I just said
- 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM
968 Views
What is important about that?
- 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM
932 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
- 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
1105 Views
So what you're saying is...
- 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM
995 Views
That's exactly it
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1057 Views
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1057 Views
Good.
- 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM
1082 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it
- 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM
932 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever.
- 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM
1019 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM
971 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM
1174 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was...
- 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM
939 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years?
- 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM
889 Views
Re: I never said it was.
- 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM
1131 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM
1164 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM
1055 Views
