Active Users:397 Time:01/05/2025 07:41:25 PM
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... dacole Send a noteboard - 24/04/2012 05:46:03 AM
Again as has been said. This obsessive attention to minor details is crazy and ridiculous and unimportant for the themes and major import of the story. As well I expect much of these type of answers Jordan was making up when asked. He did have to change things in the books to fit with his answers at some points.

The "science" of how things in the world work are far and away extremely less important than the characters, the themes, and how those characters and themes are handled.

I certainly haven't been "obsessing" for twenty years over how exactly strong each of the channelers is...I would be getting myself some help if I had been. There is being a superfan and then there is being Sheldon Cooper level crazy.
Reply to message
Very interesting QA with Brandon - 20/04/2012 11:19:02 PM 2981 Views
I'm sad - 21/04/2012 12:00:33 AM 1328 Views
Ha! Not even RJ could keep up with the world he created! *NM* - 21/04/2012 01:01:29 AM 530 Views
I found it painful to read - 21/04/2012 09:53:31 AM 1202 Views
Do you find that surprising? - 21/04/2012 02:52:47 PM 1051 Views
I find it disappointing - 22/04/2012 08:09:10 AM 971 Views
How would obscure crap screw up the story? - 21/04/2012 06:51:27 PM 1115 Views
He apparently amended himself the next day... - 21/04/2012 08:00:01 PM 1486 Views
"Brandon: Umm, when did Perrin meet Masema?" ughhh facepalm *NM* - 22/04/2012 02:45:45 AM 602 Views
Re: He apparently amended himself the next day... - 22/04/2012 08:34:39 AM 1140 Views
I find your pain highly amusing. *NM* - 23/04/2012 04:50:09 AM 638 Views
I'll make my pain yours *NM* - 23/04/2012 02:34:31 PM 546 Views
Sid.. Sid... Sid... *sigh*... *facepalm* *NM* - 24/04/2012 11:09:22 PM 622 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 02:53:38 AM 1116 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 03:10:21 PM 1178 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 23/04/2012 05:48:18 AM 1022 Views
This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 09:50:51 AM 1382 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 02:39:30 PM 1131 Views
Agreed.. - 23/04/2012 03:22:05 PM 1084 Views
Re: Agreed.. - 24/04/2012 05:47:22 AM 1040 Views
It's just their pet subject. - 24/04/2012 06:01:24 PM 1114 Views
I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 24/04/2012 10:35:28 PM 1132 Views
Re: I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 25/04/2012 05:02:04 AM 1019 Views
We are in very close alignment - 25/04/2012 01:27:37 PM 929 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 05:46:03 AM 1053 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 08:10:15 AM 1120 Views
You replied far more diplomatically than I would have... - 24/04/2012 10:10:57 AM 1026 Views
It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 01:20:48 AM 1068 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 05:05:40 PM 1071 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 27/04/2012 12:58:36 AM 988 Views
Question about TGS and ToM: - 27/04/2012 02:20:34 AM 959 Views
Very similar to you - 27/04/2012 09:50:52 PM 1057 Views
Are there plans for rewrites / reordering of the books? - 29/04/2012 01:17:48 PM 1028 Views
of course there's no plan - 30/04/2012 06:15:49 AM 1406 Views
I didn't know Harriet had such a big role in this - 30/04/2012 10:57:14 PM 927 Views
She does - 01/05/2012 03:52:40 PM 1067 Views
Egwene... - 27/04/2012 05:41:13 AM 1003 Views
Re: Egwene... - 27/04/2012 09:30:32 PM 983 Views
Re: Egwene... - 28/04/2012 09:44:43 AM 972 Views
I don't find it all that surprising - 28/04/2012 03:56:41 PM 922 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 29/04/2012 08:07:55 AM 927 Views
Agreed - 29/04/2012 01:52:06 PM 906 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 30/04/2012 07:54:14 AM 835 Views
I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 07:06:04 PM 1004 Views
Re: I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 08:36:44 PM 895 Views
Cadsuane shouldn't reswear the oaths - 30/04/2012 10:43:32 PM 1010 Views
Apparenly not - 01/05/2012 04:26:08 PM 835 Views
Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 01:18:44 AM 872 Views
Re: Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 08:17:49 PM 1191 Views
As usual we are in pretty close alignment - 02/05/2012 04:29:20 AM 1069 Views
Re: Egwene... - 30/04/2012 07:41:11 AM 841 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 07:10:35 PM 955 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 10:51:09 PM 1178 Views
I think there is a lot of TAR coming up - 05/05/2012 05:13:18 AM 832 Views
Probably - 05/05/2012 06:52:57 PM 986 Views
Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 28/04/2012 10:05:27 PM 1030 Views
Re: Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 30/04/2012 03:08:57 PM 981 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 10:49:54 PM 1041 Views
For me it's interesting simply because it is not all that well defined - 24/04/2012 11:16:14 PM 1048 Views
Quantifiable magic - 25/04/2012 04:41:43 PM 940 Views
the angreal part bothered me way more - 28/04/2012 10:51:46 AM 947 Views
what's MAFO? *NM* - 28/04/2012 07:01:52 PM 560 Views
Maria (Simmons) And Find Out - 29/04/2012 02:07:19 AM 881 Views

Reply to Message