Active Users:363 Time:01/05/2025 12:51:44 PM
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... Sidious Send a noteboard - 25/04/2012 05:05:40 PM

I understand all you have written, and I don't contest it. I clearly remember several fans going crazy because he messed up the chronological order of certain events in TGS. I recall you being one of them (though I apologize if I am incorrect). I find it a little disingenuous to be accused of being obsessive and spewing hyperbole, when I'm merely having the same reaction to my pet subject that many of you did when errors of plot reared their heads.

In any case, I don't think I was being dramatic at all. I did not write anything about 'a 20yr history'... that was another poster. I wrote that his post was frustrating to read because it was - he second guessed himself constantly when faced with minimal objections. I understand your point about him having a disclaimer about making mistakes, but then what is the point of the interview? It may be an act of goodwill but it's really pointless if he can't get much right. This is evidenced by the fact that almost nothing useful came from this interview despite it being labelled as 'interesting' on the board. There is one other post referring to his allusion to scenes from different times (as in about four other WoT books), but other than that, a very underwhelming contribution to our collective knowledge of the series.

I actually don't follow Brandon's interviews closely at all. I was surprised at how many there were when I looked. I merely looked at this one because it was on our board. He gets asked about strength in most interviews and he usually says he doesn't know. I don't know why people are suddenly so interested in strength (it's possible they've latched onto his willingness to give answers), but despite this he still hasn't gone to research a recurrent question so that he can answer it - though his reasons are his own, I fully understand this is the least important thing in his life.

I love the OP more than most other aspects in the book but I pay a lot of attention to plot too. I used to post constantly about it in times gone by. I really don't care at all if we never find out about the true strengths of everyone - I just can't stand wrong answers, for whatever reason : crowd pleasing, indifference etc... they're all equally irritating. I'm certainly not holding out for the Encyclopedia. I really don't have much time for a fleshed out BWB that I purchased a decade ago, and in any case, I'll eat my hat if there is a page with the strengths of the characters. Like many WoT readers, I want to see how the story ends. I read TGS once and I can't even remember when last I referenced the books prior to that. I'm reading other literature as I'm sure you are too.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Very interesting QA with Brandon - 20/04/2012 11:19:02 PM 2979 Views
I'm sad - 21/04/2012 12:00:33 AM 1328 Views
Ha! Not even RJ could keep up with the world he created! *NM* - 21/04/2012 01:01:29 AM 529 Views
I found it painful to read - 21/04/2012 09:53:31 AM 1200 Views
Do you find that surprising? - 21/04/2012 02:52:47 PM 1049 Views
I find it disappointing - 22/04/2012 08:09:10 AM 969 Views
How would obscure crap screw up the story? - 21/04/2012 06:51:27 PM 1115 Views
He apparently amended himself the next day... - 21/04/2012 08:00:01 PM 1486 Views
"Brandon: Umm, when did Perrin meet Masema?" ughhh facepalm *NM* - 22/04/2012 02:45:45 AM 602 Views
Re: He apparently amended himself the next day... - 22/04/2012 08:34:39 AM 1139 Views
I find your pain highly amusing. *NM* - 23/04/2012 04:50:09 AM 637 Views
I'll make my pain yours *NM* - 23/04/2012 02:34:31 PM 546 Views
Sid.. Sid... Sid... *sigh*... *facepalm* *NM* - 24/04/2012 11:09:22 PM 621 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 02:53:38 AM 1114 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 22/04/2012 03:10:21 PM 1177 Views
Re: Very interesting QA with Brandon - 23/04/2012 05:48:18 AM 1022 Views
This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 09:50:51 AM 1381 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 23/04/2012 02:39:30 PM 1131 Views
Agreed.. - 23/04/2012 03:22:05 PM 1083 Views
Re: Agreed.. - 24/04/2012 05:47:22 AM 1039 Views
It's just their pet subject. - 24/04/2012 06:01:24 PM 1114 Views
I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 24/04/2012 10:35:28 PM 1131 Views
Re: I think you may be giving RJ more credit than his due here - 25/04/2012 05:02:04 AM 1018 Views
We are in very close alignment - 25/04/2012 01:27:37 PM 928 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 05:46:03 AM 1052 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 08:10:15 AM 1119 Views
You replied far more diplomatically than I would have... - 24/04/2012 10:10:57 AM 1025 Views
It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 01:20:48 AM 1066 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 25/04/2012 05:05:40 PM 1071 Views
Re: It's got little to do with obsession... - 27/04/2012 12:58:36 AM 987 Views
Question about TGS and ToM: - 27/04/2012 02:20:34 AM 959 Views
Very similar to you - 27/04/2012 09:50:52 PM 1057 Views
Are there plans for rewrites / reordering of the books? - 29/04/2012 01:17:48 PM 1026 Views
of course there's no plan - 30/04/2012 06:15:49 AM 1405 Views
I didn't know Harriet had such a big role in this - 30/04/2012 10:57:14 PM 925 Views
She does - 01/05/2012 03:52:40 PM 1065 Views
Egwene... - 27/04/2012 05:41:13 AM 1001 Views
Re: Egwene... - 27/04/2012 09:30:32 PM 983 Views
Re: Egwene... - 28/04/2012 09:44:43 AM 972 Views
I don't find it all that surprising - 28/04/2012 03:56:41 PM 920 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 29/04/2012 08:07:55 AM 927 Views
Agreed - 29/04/2012 01:52:06 PM 904 Views
Re: I don't find it all that surprising - 30/04/2012 07:54:14 AM 833 Views
I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 07:06:04 PM 1002 Views
Re: I suspect Cadsuane will die before that happens - 30/04/2012 08:36:44 PM 895 Views
Cadsuane shouldn't reswear the oaths - 30/04/2012 10:43:32 PM 1008 Views
Apparenly not - 01/05/2012 04:26:08 PM 833 Views
Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 01:18:44 AM 872 Views
Re: Not sure Cadsuane will ever be reigned in by anyone - 01/05/2012 08:17:49 PM 1189 Views
As usual we are in pretty close alignment - 02/05/2012 04:29:20 AM 1068 Views
Re: Egwene... - 30/04/2012 07:41:11 AM 840 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 07:10:35 PM 953 Views
Re: Egwene... - 01/05/2012 10:51:09 PM 1176 Views
I think there is a lot of TAR coming up - 05/05/2012 05:13:18 AM 830 Views
Probably - 05/05/2012 06:52:57 PM 985 Views
Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 28/04/2012 10:05:27 PM 1028 Views
Re: Thanks! This fits nicely with my thoughts... - 30/04/2012 03:08:57 PM 979 Views
Re: This certainly makes a mockery of a lot that us 20-year long readers of Wot used to hold dear... - 24/04/2012 10:49:54 PM 1040 Views
For me it's interesting simply because it is not all that well defined - 24/04/2012 11:16:14 PM 1048 Views
Quantifiable magic - 25/04/2012 04:41:43 PM 939 Views
the angreal part bothered me way more - 28/04/2012 10:51:46 AM 946 Views
what's MAFO? *NM* - 28/04/2012 07:01:52 PM 560 Views
Maria (Simmons) And Find Out - 29/04/2012 02:07:19 AM 879 Views

Reply to Message