Active Users:386 Time:18/06/2025 01:27:47 AM
Re: Then... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM

In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.

Hmmm...

What you said was...
However, I think it's a strength thing too. In my opinion you have to be able to destroy another channeler's conduit to the Source. Therefore I don't think someone like Moiraine could still another channeler, unless that channeler was Morgase or Sorilea, and maybe not even then. Very strong channelers like Egwene and Nynaeve can make razor sharp shields backed up with a lot of saidar, so that when they hit you they just rip into your connection to the Source, and leave you ruined forever.

It seemed pretty clear you were talking about strength. Hence the confusion.
This message last edited by fionwe1987 on 06/10/2009 at 12:25:38 AM
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2090 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 684 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 351 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 832 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1078 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1193 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 800 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1358 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 808 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 316 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1096 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 672 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 700 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 642 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 707 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 753 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 767 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 667 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 684 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 740 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 687 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 721 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 890 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 775 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 714 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 823 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 797 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 851 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 678 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 906 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 754 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1472 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 766 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 847 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1387 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 680 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 797 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1466 Views

Reply to Message