Active Users:669 Time:30/04/2025 04:52:52 AM
Re: Then... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM

In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.

Hmmm...

What you said was...
However, I think it's a strength thing too. In my opinion you have to be able to destroy another channeler's conduit to the Source. Therefore I don't think someone like Moiraine could still another channeler, unless that channeler was Morgase or Sorilea, and maybe not even then. Very strong channelers like Egwene and Nynaeve can make razor sharp shields backed up with a lot of saidar, so that when they hit you they just rip into your connection to the Source, and leave you ruined forever.

It seemed pretty clear you were talking about strength. Hence the confusion.
This message last edited by fionwe1987 on 06/10/2009 at 12:25:38 AM
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2073 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 670 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 346 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 816 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1062 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1174 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 785 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1340 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 794 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 310 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1082 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 661 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 686 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 628 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 693 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 738 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 754 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 655 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 670 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 731 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 672 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 709 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 874 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 759 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 701 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 806 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 781 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 837 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 667 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 888 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 741 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1433 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 756 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 833 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1372 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 665 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 781 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1454 Views

Reply to Message