Active Users:620 Time:02/02/2026 11:35:48 AM
Re: Then... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM

In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.

Hmmm...

What you said was...
However, I think it's a strength thing too. In my opinion you have to be able to destroy another channeler's conduit to the Source. Therefore I don't think someone like Moiraine could still another channeler, unless that channeler was Morgase or Sorilea, and maybe not even then. Very strong channelers like Egwene and Nynaeve can make razor sharp shields backed up with a lot of saidar, so that when they hit you they just rip into your connection to the Source, and leave you ruined forever.

It seemed pretty clear you were talking about strength. Hence the confusion.
This message last edited by fionwe1987 on 06/10/2009 at 12:25:38 AM
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2249 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 824 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 419 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 979 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1216 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1332 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 939 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1501 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 969 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 390 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1223 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 790 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 844 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 774 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 870 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 871 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 905 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 797 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 808 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 897 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 816 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 866 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1023 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 919 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 852 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 975 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 943 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1003 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 843 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1049 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 901 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1662 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 923 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1007 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1536 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 815 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 927 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1624 Views

Reply to Message