Active Users:576 Time:02/08/2025 05:50:47 PM
Re: Then... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM

In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.

Hmmm...

What you said was...
However, I think it's a strength thing too. In my opinion you have to be able to destroy another channeler's conduit to the Source. Therefore I don't think someone like Moiraine could still another channeler, unless that channeler was Morgase or Sorilea, and maybe not even then. Very strong channelers like Egwene and Nynaeve can make razor sharp shields backed up with a lot of saidar, so that when they hit you they just rip into your connection to the Source, and leave you ruined forever.

It seemed pretty clear you were talking about strength. Hence the confusion.
This message last edited by fionwe1987 on 06/10/2009 at 12:25:38 AM
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2111 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 703 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 359 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 850 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1094 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1209 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 818 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1376 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 830 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 325 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1112 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 689 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 719 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 663 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 728 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 773 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 789 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 687 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 705 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 761 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 706 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 744 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 910 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 791 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 731 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 839 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 818 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 871 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 695 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 926 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 772 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1509 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 785 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 868 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1408 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 700 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 814 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1485 Views

Reply to Message