Active Users:421 Time:18/06/2025 01:07:24 AM
I'd like you to clear this up... Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.


I'd like evidence that severing requires precision weaving. Not that I'm sure what precision weaving is either. Is this about that female-strength bit?

Also, are you saying there's no evidence that women weaker than Egwene or Elayne can sever channelers? 'Cause that'd be pretty ridiculous. Not only have the Tower been severing people long before channelers of the wondergirls' strength level came along, but if you count the illegal gentling of men following the Aiel War, you have typical pre-EotW strength women severing male channelers (typically stronger than the average women, to say nothing of 'Morgase or Sorilea' and surely without a large circle - there is no way that you could gather, say, thirteen extremist Reds together outside the Tower any time you wanted to perform an illegal gentling.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2090 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 684 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 350 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 832 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1078 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1193 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 799 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1357 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 808 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 316 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1095 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 672 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 699 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 642 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 707 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 753 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 767 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 667 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 684 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 739 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 686 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 721 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 890 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 775 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 714 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 823 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 797 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 851 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 678 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 905 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 753 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1470 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 765 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 847 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1387 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 679 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 797 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1465 Views

Reply to Message