In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.
Hmmm...
What you said was...
However, I think it's a strength thing too. In my opinion you have to be able to destroy another channeler's conduit to the Source. Therefore I don't think someone like Moiraine could still another channeler, unless that channeler was Morgase or Sorilea, and maybe not even then. Very strong channelers like Egwene and Nynaeve can make razor sharp shields backed up with a lot of saidar, so that when they hit you they just rip into your connection to the Source, and leave you ruined forever.
It seemed pretty clear you were talking about strength. Hence the confusion.
From Nynaeve's PoV in TSR it shows that it is a very sharp shield which permanently destroys your ability to channel. Egwene describes hers as a powerful and sharp shield too when she stills Amico. It doesn't require channeling... it merely requires a powerful channeler who is capable of precision weaving.
For me strength and precision weaving go hand in hand.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
Still the Darkfriends.
- 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM
2334 Views
Makes sense, but...
- 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM
1070 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how
- 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM
1290 Views
Re: Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know h
- 04/10/2009 12:55:55 AM
1558 Views
Is this the real stilling?
- 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM
1426 Views
It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM
1019 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM
1581 Views
Re: It's real stilling
- 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM
1047 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM*
- 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM
431 Views
Not in my opinion
- 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM
1308 Views
How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM
871 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said?
- 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM
925 Views
I disagree.
- 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM
943 Views
Re: I disagree.
- 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM
985 Views
Then...
- 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM
894 Views
Re: Then...
- 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM
892 Views
I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM
952 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM
1105 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up...
- 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM
1006 Views
Sounds good, but the Aes Sedai aren't known for making the most logical decisions. Nice Post *NM*
- 03/10/2009 07:47:36 PM
455 Views
oops i meant to put "aren't" but i accidently put are. It's edited now. Sorry for any confusion
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
447 Views
*NM*
- 03/10/2009 10:26:50 PM
447 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM
1134 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM
987 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends.
- 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM
1752 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth
- 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM
883 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
1019 Views
The only thing worse than ignoring morality for pragmatism is moralizing a non-moral issue
- 04/10/2009 09:36:43 PM
1019 Views

.