Active Users:2328 Time:18/06/2026 05:26:05 AM
Re: Then... Sidious Send a noteboard - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM

In my original post I said that stilling requires a channeler capable of precision weaving i.e. razor sharp flows. There is no evidence that a channeler weaker than Egwene or Elayne can pull off such deft weaves (and there are many quotes available on this issue), and thus Moiraine couldn't either.

Hmmm...

What you said was...
However, I think it's a strength thing too. In my opinion you have to be able to destroy another channeler's conduit to the Source. Therefore I don't think someone like Moiraine could still another channeler, unless that channeler was Morgase or Sorilea, and maybe not even then. Very strong channelers like Egwene and Nynaeve can make razor sharp shields backed up with a lot of saidar, so that when they hit you they just rip into your connection to the Source, and leave you ruined forever.

It seemed pretty clear you were talking about strength. Hence the confusion.

From Nynaeve's PoV in TSR it shows that it is a very sharp shield which permanently destroys your ability to channel. Egwene describes hers as a powerful and sharp shield too when she stills Amico. It doesn't require channeling... it merely requires a powerful channeler who is capable of precision weaving.

For me strength and precision weaving go hand in hand.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Still the Darkfriends. - 03/10/2009 05:25:29 PM 2334 Views
ya this does work - 03/10/2009 06:32:22 PM 901 Views
Totally Agree. *NM* - 03/10/2009 06:38:27 PM 457 Views
Makes sense, but... - 03/10/2009 07:04:27 PM 1070 Views
Nynaeve does. Egwene did it solo in tDR. Rand did 3 at once in LoC, but men don't seem to know how - 03/10/2009 07:16:03 PM 1290 Views
Is this the real stilling? - 04/10/2009 09:06:32 AM 1426 Views
It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 02:55:35 PM 1019 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:46:58 PM 1581 Views
Re: It's real stilling - 04/10/2009 06:53:52 PM 1047 Views
I think Egwene took longer because it was the first time. *NM* - 04/10/2009 07:20:26 PM 431 Views
Not in my opinion - 05/10/2009 05:00:30 AM 1308 Views
How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 05:15:57 AM 871 Views
Re: How does that respond to what I said? - 05/10/2009 09:07:16 PM 925 Views
Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 12:20:21 AM 849 Views
Re: Doesn't make sense.... - 06/10/2009 07:30:04 AM 964 Views
I disagree. - 04/10/2009 10:03:56 PM 943 Views
Re: I disagree. - 05/10/2009 04:58:04 AM 985 Views
Then... - 05/10/2009 05:12:45 AM 894 Views
Re: Then... - 05/10/2009 09:09:04 PM 892 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 12:25:22 AM 996 Views
Re: Then... - 06/10/2009 07:51:48 AM 903 Views
I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 02:18:01 AM 952 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 06/10/2009 07:50:33 AM 1105 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 02:28:34 AM 1006 Views
Re: I'd like you to clear this up... - 07/10/2009 08:20:34 AM 945 Views
Well, you may, but I remain unconvinced . - 08/10/2009 12:22:31 AM 1069 Views
I think it's too risky - 03/10/2009 07:21:51 PM 1021 Views
Of course, they should still be guarded with restricted access. - 03/10/2009 09:02:21 PM 1078 Views
Re: I think it's too risky - 05/10/2009 04:51:17 AM 928 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 04:51:58 AM 1134 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 02:06:51 PM 987 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 05:45:16 PM 1752 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 04/10/2009 07:20:58 PM 1002 Views
To Clarify... - 05/10/2009 12:30:28 AM 1098 Views
Re: Still the Darkfriends. - 05/10/2009 02:54:40 PM 1624 Views
Remember Shadar Logoth - 04/10/2009 02:49:06 PM 883 Views
Re: Remember Shadar Logoth - 05/10/2009 06:05:54 AM 1002 Views
From Rand's viewpoint - 05/10/2009 01:10:18 PM 1706 Views

Reply to Message