Active Users:2315 Time:18/06/2026 03:46:15 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM
... I saw hints that she may very well have. He basically stated that even with the power of the Choedan Kal, Rand could not have possibly balefired her hard enough to erase her back before she would have theoretically killed Asmodean, so he wouldn't have reappeared afterward anyway.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2019 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 952 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1005 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 499 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 995 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1011 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1057 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1035 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 975 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 879 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 848 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 892 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 886 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 889 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 828 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 923 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 872 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 905 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 885 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 856 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 897 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 901 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 911 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 985 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 960 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 905 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 848 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 918 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 810 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 873 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 898 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 954 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 822 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 795 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 849 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 913 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 454 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 836 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 951 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 444 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 824 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 417 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 883 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 442 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 904 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 824 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 889 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 851 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 868 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 434 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 420 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 378 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 878 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 871 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 873 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 813 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 857 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 443 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 827 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 434 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 840 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 408 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes