According to Brandon, at the most, Rand could burn somebody out of the pattern a full week back. That's using the Choedan Kal, etc. Because Asmodean died more than a week ago (it was something like 6 months ago in Randland time) then Graendal could not have been Asmo's killer.
Why does your final statement follow from he first?
Asmodean is out of reach of Rand's balefire. That means Graendal could have killed him, but the balefire won't being him back. That's all.
If it is true that Graendal died by balefire, then she did not kill Asmodean, end of story.
Very well, by that logic, Graendal never killed anyone, never erformed any atrocity, and was a honorable ascetic for all her life! What crap!
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM
1900 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM
840 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM*
- 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM
448 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM
880 Views
It eliminates for the following
- 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM
895 Views
That's quite a leap of logic...
- 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM
957 Views
I can't follow your logic
- 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM
736 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic.
- 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM
807 Views
your interpretation is wrong
- 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM
799 Views
I generally agree...
- 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM
876 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM
807 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM
708 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM
771 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way.
- 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM
790 Views
This logic is lacking as well
- 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM
846 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM
800 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM*
- 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM
414 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired?
- 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM
729 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired!
- 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM
842 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM*
- 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM
399 Views
What? Did you double post?
- 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM
718 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process 
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
370 Views
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
370 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible
- 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM
763 Views
I don't say it's impossible...
- 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM
802 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM
388 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back.
- 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM
776 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite
- 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM
773 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time.
- 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM
717 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM*
- 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM
389 Views