He was actually specifically saying that he wouldn't give any clues about Asmo, hence the switch to Rahvin.
Sanderson just knew that the question-asker was trying to ask about Asmodean.
It was, "If Graendal killed Asmo, not that I'm saying she did or didn't, then her being balefired by the CK would not be enough to bring him back to life."
Sanderson just knew that the question-asker was trying to ask about Asmodean.
It was, "If Graendal killed Asmo, not that I'm saying she did or didn't, then her being balefired by the CK would not be enough to bring him back to life."
I amuse myself.
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM
2123 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM
1058 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM*
- 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM
567 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM
1109 Views
It eliminates for the following
- 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM
1104 Views
That's quite a leap of logic...
- 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM
1146 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong.
- 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM
979 Views
I can't follow your logic
- 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM
946 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic.
- 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM
1023 Views
your interpretation is wrong
- 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM
1002 Views
I generally agree...
- 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM
1099 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM
1011 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM
901 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM
985 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way.
- 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM
1010 Views
This logic is lacking as well
- 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM
1058 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM
1005 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM*
- 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM
507 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired?
- 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM
936 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired!
- 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM
1057 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM*
- 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM
498 Views
What? Did you double post?
- 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM
920 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process 
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
473 Views
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
473 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible
- 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM
971 Views
I don't say it's impossible...
- 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM
1000 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM
493 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back.
- 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM
974 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite
- 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM
980 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time.
- 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM
947 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM*
- 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM
488 Views