Active Users:670 Time:08/11/2026 11:45:55 AM
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM
The only thing that is discussed is how far back the effects of balefire go. There's no definitive discussion on ANYthing else.

Notice something about Sanderson's comments. He said, 'let's say that the CK makes Rand 100x more powerful'. He's not saying it DOES - that's just his supposition. That's beautiful Aes Sedai misdirection.

---

Extending that thought further then...

Why can't the CK make Rand more like 10,000x more powerful? That's always the order of magnitude I was imagining based on the descriptions in the book... for the strongest sa'angreal ever made? When an 'average' sa'angreal raises the user's ability above that of an angreal to the same order of magnitude that an 'average' angreal does over using no enhancement?

With that in mind, the existence of multiple sa'angreal multiplying your power 250x becomes extremely likely. 100x is certainly nothing special for a sa'angreal... and when you consider that these CK were considered 'too strong to ever be used', able to fight the Dark One (or the CREATOR, by Lanfear!), and able to crack the world in half... 100x Rand's power just doesn't fit the description.

10,000 times 30 minutes of Rand back-tracking is approximately 200 days. This isn't a proof that this happened, of course, but a proof of concept. If we can reach back in the vicinity of a year, then anything is still possible. And nothing Sanderson said ruled it out... all he addressed was a very limited 'what if'.
Former wotmaniac Rand al`Thor, 2001-2009. RIP wotmania...
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2124 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 1059 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1104 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 567 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 1111 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1106 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1147 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1125 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 1075 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 977 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 936 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 1003 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 981 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 980 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 948 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 1013 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 964 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 1023 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 985 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 964 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 1002 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 1012 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 1020 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 1101 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 1084 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 1009 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 968 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 1013 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 1060 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 915 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 901 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 943 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 1005 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 507 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 1058 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 498 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 922 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 973 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 494 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 1002 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 925 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 975 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 954 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 972 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 480 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 426 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 982 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 963 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 902 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 949 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 494 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 929 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 463 Views

Reply to Message