Active Users:1080 Time:06/08/2026 09:01:09 PM
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM
The only thing this confirms is that balefire can only remove a thread up to a few days/maybe a week. And that Asomodean died long enough ago that if his killer were balefired he wouldn't come back to life.

This in no way comments about whether Graendal was the killer or not - you can tell very much by Sanderson's reaction. He wasn't going to let this question lead him down that road.


Can Graendal reveal herself as Asmodean's killer in the next two books?

Answer: NO, because she got balefired and we will not see her anymore.

Therefore, someone else will reveal themselves as Asmodean's killer.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2055 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 996 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1043 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 521 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 1040 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1044 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1093 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1069 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 1008 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 918 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 875 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 934 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 924 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 927 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 874 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 954 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 903 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 946 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 927 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 898 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 940 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 941 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 959 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 1038 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 1012 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 946 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 888 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 958 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 991 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 858 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 833 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 885 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 944 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 473 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 982 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 463 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 857 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 915 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 464 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 944 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 864 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 919 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 892 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 911 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 437 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 396 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 917 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 906 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 846 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 894 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 463 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 872 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 430 Views

Reply to Message