Active Users:365 Time:01/05/2025 12:36:41 PM
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM
The only thing that is discussed is how far back the effects of balefire go. There's no definitive discussion on ANYthing else.

Notice something about Sanderson's comments. He said, 'let's say that the CK makes Rand 100x more powerful'. He's not saying it DOES - that's just his supposition. That's beautiful Aes Sedai misdirection.

---


But it does eliminate Graendal.

Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing). But we know that someone will reveal themselves as Asmodean's killer.

Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1749 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 724 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 794 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 375 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 715 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 732 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 843 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 800 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 745 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 631 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 646 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 664 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 664 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 676 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 630 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 710 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 656 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 669 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 654 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 634 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 691 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 657 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 670 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 752 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 704 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 709 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 627 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 666 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 604 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 708 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 570 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 568 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 622 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 679 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 347 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 701 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 333 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 600 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 650 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 327 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 662 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 590 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 680 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 629 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 633 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 303 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 284 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 643 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 634 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 585 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 618 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 328 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 599 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 277 Views

Reply to Message