The logic goes like this:
Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).
Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal.
Graendal cannot reveal herself as Asmodean's killer directly (because she is balefired) or indirectly (by Asmodean reappearing).
Ergo, somebody else killed Asmodean, not Graendal.
First of all Graendal CAN reveal heself as Asmo's killer. We haven't SEEN Graendal reveal herself as Asmo's killer, that doesn't mean she hasn't. In fact since it is very very very likely that tGS and ToM run on parallel time lines for a while we may YET see Graendal reveal herself. On the other hand we may not. Just because I don't say something about B doesn't mean that I didn't do B. It just means you didn't hear me say "I did B".
NaCl(faulty reasoning all the way down the line)H2O
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM
1808 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM
765 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM*
- 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM
395 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not.
- 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM
774 Views
It eliminates for the following
- 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM
769 Views
That's quite a leap of logic...
- 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM
884 Views
I can't follow your logic
- 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM
664 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic
- 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM
754 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong.
- 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM
702 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic.
- 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM
710 Views
your interpretation is wrong
- 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM
728 Views
I generally agree...
- 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM
790 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM
708 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM
642 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean.
- 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM
708 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way.
- 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM
718 Views
This logic is lacking as well
- 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM
746 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer
- 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM
719 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM*
- 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM
368 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired?
- 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM
654 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired!
- 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM
760 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM*
- 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM
353 Views
What? Did you double post?
- 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM
640 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process 
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
334 Views
*NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM
334 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible
- 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM
688 Views
I don't say it's impossible...
- 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM
705 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM*
- 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM
354 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back.
- 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM
664 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite
- 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM
677 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time.
- 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM
644 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM*
- 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM
340 Views