Active Users:720 Time:19/03/2026 05:20:32 PM
I'm not a writer... Etzel Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM
But even to me it seems just most natural and obvious that one would reveal the murder best and in the most powerful way, if the killer himself muses about it. And RJ actually indicated the same in the past.

Heck, that's also the real reason why some people - who are convinced that Graendal killed Asmo no matter what - believe now that there certainly will be a PoV from Graendal in ToM previous her death (of course conveniently ignoring the fact that Graendal has nothing to do with Mat's, Perrin's or Elayne's plotline..).
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1948 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 883 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 952 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 469 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 939 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 938 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1004 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 981 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 915 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 819 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 801 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 833 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 830 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 829 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 768 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 863 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 825 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 856 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 827 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 800 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 835 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 842 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 864 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 920 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 892 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 855 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 791 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 856 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 899 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 764 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 732 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 788 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 844 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 432 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 887 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 414 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 765 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 823 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 416 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 842 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 750 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 832 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 797 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 810 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 391 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 350 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 817 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 817 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 753 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 795 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 419 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 778 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 377 Views

Reply to Message