Active Users:1105 Time:06/08/2026 09:07:41 PM
NO! fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM
Graendal cannot comment later that she killed Asmodean if she is dead by balefire.

If she is dead, she cannot comment later anyway, barring her resurrection by the DO.
But that means squat for ToM. A lot of it will focus on timelines before Graendal's death. We may see her PoV then.

More importantly, someone else may reveal that she killed Asmodean.

3. The only possible way to still implicate Graendal as Asmodean's killer is if somehow Asmodean were to reappear in the series (i.e. if Graendal were the killer and she was balefired back far enough, then Asmo might reappear)

WRONG. There are other ways to implicate her. Her own PoV or someone else's.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 2055 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 996 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 1044 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 521 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 1041 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 1046 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1093 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1071 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 1010 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 919 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 877 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 936 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 926 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 928 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 876 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 956 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 904 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 948 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 927 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 899 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 942 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 942 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 960 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 1039 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 1014 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 948 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 889 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 959 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 992 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 860 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 834 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 887 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 944 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 473 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 982 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 463 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 859 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 916 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 464 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 945 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 865 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 921 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 893 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 913 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 437 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 396 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 919 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 906 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 847 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 895 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 463 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 873 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 430 Views

Reply to Message