Active Users:701 Time:03/05/2026 09:28:53 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Logical? Naiowen Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM
Sorry, no. That's not logical. Just because we haven't seen Graendal reveal herself as the killer does not mean that she did not kill Asmodean. As has been stated, TGS and ToM may run paralell for a time so we don't know anything for sure.

Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1990 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 926 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 982 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 484 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 971 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 985 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 1034 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 1010 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 948 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 852 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 827 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 864 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 863 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 862 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 806 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 902 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 853 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 883 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 866 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 831 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 872 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 874 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 888 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 955 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 933 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 886 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 823 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 894 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 785 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 845 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 875 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 927 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 799 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 768 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 828 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 883 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 441 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 812 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 921 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 427 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 798 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 402 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 857 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 426 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 878 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 795 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 860 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 829 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 844 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 419 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 406 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 363 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 853 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 844 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 852 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 788 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 829 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 431 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 792 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 420 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 818 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 393 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes