Active Users:556 Time:01/02/2026 08:09:40 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Logical? Naiowen Send a noteboard - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM
Sorry, no. That's not logical. Just because we haven't seen Graendal reveal herself as the killer does not mean that she did not kill Asmodean. As has been stated, TGS and ToM may run paralell for a time so we don't know anything for sure.

Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Logain - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1918 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 861 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... Yvves - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 936 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 461 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 912 Views
It eliminates for the following Logain - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 911 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 978 Views
Re: Logain - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 957 Views
You make a faulty assumption Marshall - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 895 Views
NO! fionwe1987 - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 793 Views
Why? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 781 Views
Re: Why? Logain - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 806 Views
Logical? Naiowen - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 804 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. beetnemesis - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 810 Views
I can't follow your logic PatAtt - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 750 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic Logain - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 842 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 798 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 830 Views
Yes, but... Logain - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 800 Views
That is still erroneous. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 769 Views
your interpretation is wrong kcf - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 817 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong Logain - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 818 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. kcf - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 835 Views
I generally agree... Etzel - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 894 Views
Re: I generally agree... TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 865 Views
I'm not a writer... Etzel - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 834 Views
Agree BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 766 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 834 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Logain - 11/11/2009 07:53:19 PM 729 Views
Re: There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:31:12 PM 791 Views
Logain is just making too much of a RJ comment in which he said he'd "probably" do it that way. Legolas - 12/11/2009 12:13:25 AM 811 Views
This logic is lacking as well PatAtt - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 877 Views
Your comments make sense. Rand al'Thor - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 733 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 707 Views
Two Things TaskmasterJack - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 767 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 818 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* Logain - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 422 Views
Re: But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? Gnosis18 - 11/11/2009 08:15:16 PM 752 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 859 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 407 Views
What? Did you double post? Light in the Night - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 738 Views
Ya, got couple of phone calls and some other stuff and forgot where I was in the process *NM* NaClH2O - 11/11/2009 10:10:10 PM 378 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 785 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* NaClH2O - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 408 Views
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 821 Views
This was done in the series before... fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 733 Views
I meant... Etzel - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 805 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 775 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! NaClH2O - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 777 Views
We can still have a pre-death PoV from her. Or another Chosen can implicate her. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:48:10 PM 396 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* Deadsy - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 381 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 342 Views
That did not confirm anything except her being balefired wouldn't bring him back. everynametaken - 12/11/2009 03:48:43 AM 799 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite Sidious - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 798 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 795 Views
there was a bit more before it Deadsy - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 728 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. Legolas - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 774 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* BlackAdder - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 408 Views
That is the most absurd leap in logic I have read in a LONG time. MightyYT - 12/11/2009 02:51:00 PM 730 Views
Then you must have missed the threads about Elayne, Aviendha and Min melting together. =P *NM* Rand al'Thor - 12/11/2009 06:24:53 PM 396 Views
Maybe I missed something. echooff - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 757 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* Etzel - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 366 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes