Active Users:368 Time:17/06/2025 07:11:12 PM
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite PatAtt Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM

The fan starts to initiate a question regarding balefire and resurrection, and Brandon immediately tells him he's trying to see if Graendal's death would revive Asmodean. That is quite a leap for Brandon to make.

He didn't jump to Semirhage who was balefired, but right onto Graendal. Very suspicious.


You might be correct. I hadn't noticed that. However, it also states that Brandon had heard the theory before so perhaps he just assumed that it was the same theory. In reality, I did the math above and the strain on the pattern if Graendal (and all of the other inhabitants) would be devastating to the Pattern if they could go that far back.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1780 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 735 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 813 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 379 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 741 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 742 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 857 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 810 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 755 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 642 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 659 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 679 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 680 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 687 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 642 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 725 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 671 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 682 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 671 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 645 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 704 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 673 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 683 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 763 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 720 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 720 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 640 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 678 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 720 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 581 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 581 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 636 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 691 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 358 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 726 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 342 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 613 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 665 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 334 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 675 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 607 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 692 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 639 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 654 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 312 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 289 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 653 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 649 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 599 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 638 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 337 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 611 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 284 Views

Reply to Message