Active Users:1607 Time:22/10/2025 12:32:26 AM
I don't say it's impossible... Etzel Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM
I just say it makes no sense.. ;)
At least in my opinion.

BS obviously means that the other plotlines, which are behind Rand's and Egwene's, will be brought to the same point in ToM, namely Perrin, Mat, Elayne, likely Aviendha, Lan, Loial, Fain, etc.

However, Graendal was tied to Rand's plotline, which isn't behind in the timeline, but was pretty much concluded in TGS for now. As far as we know, Graendal has no relevance in the plotlines of the others, because she had to concentrate on Rand to fulfill Moridin's orders (Graendal even says in TGS that she doesn't care about the other two ta'veren). Since ToM will - according to BS - anyway be a less focused book than TGS (probably because there are more plotlines), it makes no sense for BS to confuse the readers even more about the timeline by giving a likely redundant PoV from Graendal before her death (and AFAIK, something like this was never done in the series). As BS indicated, other characters will just mention Graendal in ToM.
Reply to message
Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 05:18:48 PM 1861 Views
He didn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:27:34 PM 805 Views
I definately did not see conclusive evidence; in fact... - 11/11/2009 05:32:20 PM 874 Views
Yes, Brandon did. I edited my original message to add in another quote from Brandon...see above *NM* - 11/11/2009 05:33:27 PM 418 Views
That still doesn't say if she did or did not. - 11/11/2009 05:39:12 PM 825 Views
It eliminates for the following - 11/11/2009 05:44:29 PM 814 Views
That's quite a leap of logic... - 11/11/2009 06:31:21 PM 923 Views
Re: - 11/11/2009 07:46:15 PM 892 Views
You make a faulty assumption - 11/11/2009 08:06:52 PM 826 Views
NO! - 11/11/2009 09:07:39 PM 707 Views
Why? - 11/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 722 Views
Re: Why? - 11/11/2009 07:48:14 PM 747 Views
Logical? - 11/11/2009 09:16:18 PM 749 Views
Er? I think you're reading it wrong. - 11/11/2009 06:32:17 PM 749 Views
I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 06:33:41 PM 698 Views
Re: I can't follow your logic - 11/11/2009 07:47:27 PM 793 Views
I'm sorry but you are terribly wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:34:56 PM 751 Views
That is a fallacious leap of logic. - 11/11/2009 06:50:13 PM 764 Views
Yes, but... - 11/11/2009 07:49:39 PM 734 Views
That is still erroneous. - 11/11/2009 08:10:15 PM 706 Views
your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 05:47:53 PM 771 Views
Re: your interpretation is wrong - 11/11/2009 07:51:01 PM 740 Views
I repeat, your interpretation is wrong. - 11/11/2009 08:15:43 PM 755 Views
I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 06:11:46 PM 833 Views
Re: I generally agree... - 11/11/2009 08:01:31 PM 782 Views
I'm not a writer... - 11/11/2009 08:48:25 PM 782 Views
Agree - 18/11/2009 11:22:09 PM 713 Views
There's nothing in those quotes that even touches on who killed Asmodean. - 11/11/2009 06:40:31 PM 765 Views
This logic is lacking as well - 11/11/2009 10:17:48 PM 784 Views
Your comments make sense. - 11/11/2009 11:29:29 PM 664 Views
Re: Your comments make sense. - 12/11/2009 04:48:19 AM 647 Views
Two Things - 11/11/2009 07:58:11 PM 694 Views
Re: Sanderson eliminates a particular somebody from consideration as Asmodean's killer - 11/11/2009 07:59:32 PM 760 Views
But do you agree that Graendal cannot reveal herself if she got balefired? *NM* - 11/11/2009 08:07:53 PM 392 Views
Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 11/11/2009 08:52:49 PM 797 Views
this is what happens when you get interrupted in the middle of a post *NM* - 11/11/2009 09:28:01 PM 372 Views
What? Did you double post? - 11/11/2009 09:49:15 PM 676 Views
According to Etzel, this is impossible - 12/11/2009 04:14:47 AM 725 Views
Why is it impossible? You can't have parallel timelines? *NM* - 12/11/2009 11:29:45 AM 370 Views
I don't say it's impossible... - 12/11/2009 03:11:17 PM 753 Views
This was done in the series before... - 12/11/2009 03:40:58 PM 683 Views
I meant... - 12/11/2009 04:02:33 PM 749 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 18/11/2009 11:32:03 PM 709 Views
Re: Sure she can reveal herself! Even if she got Balefired! - 19/11/2009 01:57:48 AM 715 Views
that proved nothing. *NM* - 11/11/2009 10:46:15 PM 352 Views
Rather pointless, really. *NM* - 12/11/2009 01:08:14 AM 312 Views
Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:13:45 AM 730 Views
Re: Uh, I read the exact opposite - 12/11/2009 04:53:39 AM 720 Views
there was a bit more before it - 12/11/2009 05:03:20 AM 675 Views
Not so suspicious if he's read some fan reactions/theories. - 12/11/2009 11:48:30 AM 715 Views
Which he clearly said he did and LOL'd at. *NM* - 18/11/2009 11:33:58 PM 370 Views
Maybe I missed something. - 12/11/2009 03:02:59 PM 681 Views
Yeah, BS will reveal it either in ToM or AMoL. *NM* - 12/11/2009 03:12:16 PM 329 Views

Reply to Message