Active Users:256 Time:09/05/2024 12:18:31 AM
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... Knightscape Send a noteboard - 13/11/2009 09:56:01 PM
...it's not like it makes them any deader. Getting outraged on their behalf doesn't make much sense.

The only extra risk by balefiring them (instead of just killing them in some other form of collateral damage) is the danger to the Pattern itself. And there's pretty much no other way Rand could have successfully tricked Graendal in order to eliminate her...

I'm outraged at the damage to the Pattern. There were so many ways Rand could have altered this.

Here's one...

He disguises himself as Ramshalan. He goes with the same message. However, he is holding the source all the while, and has the CK concealed with him.

The moment he gives his message, Graendal would try to compel him. All he has to do at this point is Balefire her.

Its pretty foolproof, since holding the source makes him immune to her compulsion.

There, Graendal is permanently dead, he know that she is, and the Pattern is not destabilized.


If this was so easy to do than why didn't Nynaeve or Min suggest this to him?

The pattern wanted him to do this.
If the pattern didn't want him to do this, than the pattern would have intervened. (Rand gets ready to balefire Graendal and the castle, just as he is about to complete the weave a pidgeon drops dead and falls on his arm knocking the Choendal Kal from his grasp)
All good things come to those who wait.
Reply to message
Who performs the worst atrocity in this book: Egwene or Rand? (A good Cannoli question) - 13/11/2009 06:22:50 PM 2000 Views
Egwene also killed Aes Sedai who belonged to the shadow by the dozens - 13/11/2009 07:19:14 PM 722 Views
Re: Egwene also killed Aes Sedai who belonged to the shadow by the dozens - 13/11/2009 07:25:14 PM 655 Views
Forcible turning is not the only method - 13/11/2009 08:28:08 PM 757 Views
But... - 13/11/2009 08:43:53 PM 796 Views
The point is - 13/11/2009 11:00:58 PM 538 Views
They were tried. *NM* - 14/11/2009 12:23:45 AM 265 Views
Mock trials - 14/11/2009 08:06:14 AM 620 Views
Proof? - 14/11/2009 09:09:14 AM 554 Views
That's the impression I got from Sheriam's 'trial' - 14/11/2009 09:44:09 AM 632 Views
But... - 14/11/2009 06:55:54 PM 600 Views
And if Verin had been caught, she would have deserved death. - 13/11/2009 11:55:13 PM 701 Views
Ordinarily, I would disagree... - 14/11/2009 04:20:28 AM 750 Views
Re: Ordinarily, I would disagree... - 14/11/2009 08:04:37 AM 653 Views
They had trials. No mention of them presenting such evidence. *NM* - 13/11/2009 11:54:23 PM 278 Views
Forced turnings should be killed too - 15/11/2009 07:06:43 AM 564 Views
Sad but true - 07/12/2009 05:05:08 PM 536 Views
Based on those two actions... - 13/11/2009 08:01:32 PM 735 Views
How was she going to protect the Tower and occupants then? - 13/11/2009 08:02:31 PM 638 Views
There is a difference between collateral damage and targeting your own people! *NM* - 13/11/2009 11:56:10 PM 299 Views
She did not target her own people... - 14/11/2009 12:39:14 AM 595 Views
You seem to be contradicting yourself here - 14/11/2009 07:52:07 AM 649 Views
Because they were indistinct specks high in the sky? *NM* - 14/11/2009 09:11:15 AM 282 Views
Considering the power she had in her hands - 14/11/2009 09:52:10 AM 940 Views
That's ridiculous... - 14/11/2009 07:07:11 PM 627 Views
Re: That's ridiculous... - 14/11/2009 07:21:44 PM 614 Views
typical cannoli double speak, she wasn't targeting her own people - 14/11/2009 01:46:10 AM 2204 Views
Nothing wrong with that. - 14/11/2009 08:11:15 AM 668 Views
She does have first hand experience - 14/11/2009 07:52:20 PM 663 Views
Dozens of dark sisters together...trapped like rats... - 18/11/2009 12:29:19 AM 580 Views
Neither is an atrocity... - 13/11/2009 08:17:08 PM 867 Views
this ^ *NM* - 13/11/2009 08:34:10 PM 245 Views
Re: Neither is an atrocity... - 13/11/2009 08:59:30 PM 667 Views
Bull Sh!t! - 13/11/2009 09:08:00 PM 681 Views
Come on now... - 13/11/2009 09:13:50 PM 596 Views
Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 09:26:11 PM 609 Views
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 09:56:01 PM 526 Views
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 10:08:06 PM 543 Views
Re: Not outraged on their behalf... - 13/11/2009 10:37:04 PM 620 Views
- 13/11/2009 10:45:57 PM 559 Views
Re: - 13/11/2009 11:16:58 PM 596 Views
Re: - 14/11/2009 12:34:49 AM 498 Views
Re: - 14/11/2009 01:46:51 AM 595 Views
Yes your argument is very much Bull Sh!t - 13/11/2009 09:15:17 PM 662 Views
So... - 13/11/2009 09:27:11 PM 615 Views
Re: So... - 13/11/2009 10:07:15 PM 529 Views
Not at all... - 13/11/2009 10:09:43 PM 539 Views
Re: Not at all... - 13/11/2009 10:54:14 PM 530 Views
Re: Not at all... - 14/11/2009 12:36:36 AM 538 Views
Break out the inflatable balloon swords and have at it already! - 14/11/2009 02:14:47 AM 566 Views
Rand. - 13/11/2009 09:17:14 PM 689 Views
Re: Rand. - 13/11/2009 10:56:04 PM 691 Views
But that is not her choice to make. She has NO right to decide that for anyone. *NM* - 13/11/2009 11:57:03 PM 298 Views
No, she had no right to make that choice - 14/11/2009 03:54:35 AM 533 Views
Yes, it was her choice to make, and she is now responsible for the consequences. - 16/11/2009 06:24:46 PM 953 Views
Its the difference between - 14/11/2009 02:59:42 AM 580 Views
Cannoli mentioned already - after balefire you can live again - 20/11/2009 03:38:06 AM 494 Views

Reply to Message