Active Users:472 Time:02/05/2025 10:55:20 PM
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
Dragonmount reported from a recent signing the following Q&A:

Q: "Were you surprised when you found out who killed Asmodean?"

A: "Brandon had been a fan for a long time before he got to find out who killed Asmodean. He said that he had heard arguments for every possible suspect, including the really crazy ones like Tam. So when he found out the real answer, he wasn’t shocked. His reaction was more 'Oh, those guys were right'. He said that the clues are there, but he never would have figured it out himself."

This surprise ("Oh, those guys were right" ) clearly speaks against the idea that the "obvious" suspect of the majority of the WoT fans, Graendal, killed Asmo. Of course, Graendal's death already made it most unlikely.

And btw, Tam is apparently also excluded..
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1253 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 701 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 812 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 812 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 656 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 621 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 632 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 549 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 501 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 539 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 678 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 630 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 537 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 609 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 720 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 645 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 592 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 260 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 239 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 682 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 814 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 240 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 230 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 528 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 606 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 235 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 632 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 670 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 661 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 537 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 677 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 599 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 573 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 626 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 554 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 500 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 788 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 244 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 234 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 542 Views

Reply to Message