The Graendal theory is known by most theory-ists, but by no means is universally accepted. And "oh, those guys were right" simply means that one school of thought on the subject is correct. So, basically, any theory that's had more than a handful of adherents is still in the running.
I amuse myself.
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory
- 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
1384 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM
822 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books...
- 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM
941 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal
- 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM
923 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM
763 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes.
- 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM
725 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
755 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny.
- 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM
642 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it
- 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM
615 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either.
- 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM
658 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo...
- 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM
784 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much.
- 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM
719 Views
That's wrong
- 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
824 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong.
- 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM
773 Views
right here
- 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM
699 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM
318 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM
297 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM*
- 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM
292 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM
773 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM
773 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM*
- 14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM
297 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM
916 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all
- 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM
624 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws...
- 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM
717 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson.
- 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM
781 Views
No. Try again.
- 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM
797 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you! 
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
283 Views
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
283 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory
- 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM
710 Views
Nonsense...
- 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM
664 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. 
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
740 Views
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
740 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM
648 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM
603 Views