Active Users:853 Time:16/09/2025 01:45:34 AM
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM
The Graendal theory is known by most theory-ists, but by no means is universally accepted. And "oh, those guys were right" simply means that one school of thought on the subject is correct. So, basically, any theory that's had more than a handful of adherents is still in the running.
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1311 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 757 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 881 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 867 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 707 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 675 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 682 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 605 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 557 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 589 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 734 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 751 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 592 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 660 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 770 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 743 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 650 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 279 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 262 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 723 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 862 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 262 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 252 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 575 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 664 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 257 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 693 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 731 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 718 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 591 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 729 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 654 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 619 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 677 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 608 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 552 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 836 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 271 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 256 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 593 Views

Reply to Message