The Graendal theory is known by most theory-ists, but by no means is universally accepted. And "oh, those guys were right" simply means that one school of thought on the subject is correct. So, basically, any theory that's had more than a handful of adherents is still in the running.
I amuse myself.
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory
- 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM
1561 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM
992 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books...
- 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM
1133 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal
- 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM
1086 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM
934 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes.
- 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM
882 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV
- 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
931 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny.
- 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM
795 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it
- 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM
783 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either.
- 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM
827 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo...
- 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM
974 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much.
- 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM
888 Views
That's wrong
- 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM
1018 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong.
- 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM
934 Views
right here
- 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM
856 Views
If Graendal's name is mentioned, then "Graendal" is in the book. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 12:13:57 PM
405 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM*
- 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM
382 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM*
- 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM
375 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM
946 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM
946 Views
BS never would have figured it out himself that Graendal did it? *NM*
- 14/11/2009 05:20:19 PM
372 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that.
- 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM
1100 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all
- 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM
780 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws...
- 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM
904 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson.
- 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM
959 Views
No. Try again.
- 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM
972 Views
Ok, I will stay alert for further blows to Graendaldunnit, if this didn't already convince you! 
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
356 Views
*NM*
- 15/11/2009 10:02:26 AM
356 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory
- 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM
879 Views
Nonsense...
- 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM
845 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. 
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
893 Views
- 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM
893 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM
815 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions...
- 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM
773 Views