Active Users:839 Time:22/01/2026 11:05:04 PM
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
I don't see as how RJ's original probable intent matters a whole lot in the discussion. I agree that an Asmo-killer pov would be best, but I can't agree that it will be the method.


Because it obviously would have a more powerful impact. If Graendal was the killer, BS just had the chance to reveal it in her PoV in TGS, prologue. Why then, should he skip this opportunity to let it e.g. Moridin tell someone else that Graendal did it? Makes no sense.

And I actually bet that no one, who thought Graendal did it, even considered the possibilty before TGS that the revelation won't be in Graendal's PoV. The idea that a third person will reveal the killer is just an attempt to rescue a wrong theory. Graendaldunnit is as dead as Graendal, IMO.
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1412 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 839 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 963 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 943 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 787 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 742 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 775 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 658 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 637 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 677 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 802 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 812 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 657 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 734 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 844 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 795 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 718 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 304 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 302 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 792 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 941 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 283 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 294 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 642 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 738 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 286 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 748 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 801 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 801 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 671 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 819 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 726 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 689 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 765 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 672 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 621 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 912 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 312 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 291 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 664 Views

Reply to Message