Active Users:409 Time:04/12/2025 03:55:13 PM
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
I don't see as how RJ's original probable intent matters a whole lot in the discussion. I agree that an Asmo-killer pov would be best, but I can't agree that it will be the method.


Because it obviously would have a more powerful impact. If Graendal was the killer, BS just had the chance to reveal it in her PoV in TGS, prologue. Why then, should he skip this opportunity to let it e.g. Moridin tell someone else that Graendal did it? Makes no sense.

And I actually bet that no one, who thought Graendal did it, even considered the possibilty before TGS that the revelation won't be in Graendal's PoV. The idea that a third person will reveal the killer is just an attempt to rescue a wrong theory. Graendaldunnit is as dead as Graendal, IMO.
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1378 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 810 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 937 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 915 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 758 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 721 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 748 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 638 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 612 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 651 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 779 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 786 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 626 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 710 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 819 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 770 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 694 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 294 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 289 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 770 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 908 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 274 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 285 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 619 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 712 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 280 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 721 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 775 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 769 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 649 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 791 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 705 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 656 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 735 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 643 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 598 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 889 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 302 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 281 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 637 Views

Reply to Message